, 22 tweets, 9 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
SC bench headed by Justice Ramana starts hearing the petition against Kashmir shutdown
Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi appearing for Journalists Union, which has intervened in the matter.
Bench asks why SG not available. AG informs he's in court 3
Huzefa Ahmadi refering to ADM Jabalpur case.
J Ramana- Don't expand the issue. We are aware of the issue. Won't be able to conclude hearing before vacation like this
Ahmadi reiterates his argument on reasonableness. Refers to argument on imposition of emergencyraised during the last hearing, which may be read here.

'If You Want To Lockdown The Entire State, Declare Emergency Under Art 352', Sibal In #Kashmir Plea

Bench inclined to hear the case all day today. Asks who will be arguing. Informed that Dushyant Dave and Meenakshi Arora will argue for Petitioners too. Bench inclined to conclude arguments on behalf of Petitioners today
Sr Adv Ahmadi argues about political prisoners during emergency and refers to SC observations in ADM Jabalpur. Cites dissenting judgement as "it is the law today, since the majority judgment was overruled"
Sr Adv Ahmadi : There was an emergency then, not in the present case. No need to give reasons then, they said. Saying the same in this case. No one can be deprived of right to life and liberty without authority of law. Even in the absence of Art21.
Ahmadi : During emergency the govt used the ground of emergency to not allow the detained to move court. Here they cite national security to not produce orders or reasons.
Ahmadi : Orders under 144 must be based on material facts which led to an informed opinion. Not on mere apprehension
J Reddy- according to you, what should be material facts?
HA- there are intelligence agencies. Specific inputs from govt intelligence.
J Reddy- Should govt wait a day or two before ordering?
HA- Not necessarily. But material facts are required. It'll become a norm if no reasons are given. Then any govt can impose 144 whenever they want, based on apprehension
Sr Adv Ahmadi refers to 5(2) of Telegraph Act. "Our jurisprudence does not allow for a presumption of criminality based on suspicion", he submits.
Refering to precedents to buttress the point
Ahmadi : Restrictions under Art 19 must pass test of proportionality. The test is that measures taken have to be in order to meet a legitimate goal or suitable cause. The same must not have disproportionate impact.
Ahmadi cites Privacy judgment. SC had held that in matters concerning restrictions on liberty and privacy, even to achieve a legitimate end, the route must be least intrusive. Restrictions must be tailored narrowly.
Ahamid refers to a Hong Kong court judgement which held a face mask ban as unconstitutional. He says govt can't completely restrict a citizen's right to protest. People must be allowed to disagree.
The report about Hong Kong judgment here :
Ahmadi concludes. Now Sr Adv Dushyant Dave for another intervenor in Anuradha Bhasin's case @AnuradhaBhasin_
@AnuradhaBhasin_ Dave cracks a joke calling himself a tailender who has now come to bat.

J Ramana says he should be careful with his words and asks if he's blaming the court for the delay.
@AnuradhaBhasin_ Dave clarifies that no one is against the court. They are questioning the Govts action.
"Petitioners should not be looked at as being against the integrity of the nation. I urge your lordships not to be sensitive. We are asking the govt why restrictions have not been lifted"
@AnuradhaBhasin_ J Gavai again asks about the whereabouts of SG, and presence of ASGs. "We have been hearing the same arguments repeatedly in such an important matter"
@AnuradhaBhasin_ #Kashmir
Dave suggests all other matters should have been set aside by the court to hear the grievance of 7 million people.
It is our grievance that nothing happened between Aug-Oct, he says
@AnuradhaBhasin_ Dave says he'll finish today. Bench says SG will appear and answer all questions tomorrow. "No more adjournments"
@AnuradhaBhasin_ Dave- these 7 million people are as Indian as anyone else, even more since 370 abrogated. Their grievance needs to be addressed. It's been 106 days
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Live Law

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!