Sondland Thread: "First, Secretary Perry, Ambassador Volker and I worked with Mr. Rudy Giuliani on Ukraine matters at the express direction of the President of the United States. We did not want to work with Mr. Giuliani. Simply put, we were playing the hand we were dealt."
The suggestion that we were engaged in some sort of “irregular or rogue diplomacy is absolutely false,” says Sondland, who said that top officials at the State Department and National Security Council were deeply engaged in the policy.
💥 "Mr. Giuliani’s requests were a quid pro quo for arranging a White House visit for President Z ... Mr. Giuliani was expressing the desires of the President of the United States, and we knew that these investigations were important to the President." Absent: security aid.
Later, Sondland says that he shared concerns of the "potential quid pro quo" regarding the security aid w/ Sen. Johnson.
Sondland leaning into the everyone-was-doing-it defense. Says he communicated w/ Pompeo, his counselor Brechbuhl and secretary Lisa Kenna, Bolton, Hill, Morrison, and their staff at the NSC. "They knew what we were doing, and why," says Sondland.
Sondland says the issue of investigations was "probably" raised during his meeting w/ Yermak on July 26th, but that he doesn't remember.
Sondland says he "primarily discussed A$AP Rocky" with President Trump during his now-famous phone call from the Ukrainian restaurant. Um.
Sondland reiterates quid-pro-quo statement on WH meeting/call: "Was there a “quid pro quo?” As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes."
Sondland trying to pull Pompeo into all of this (from his written testimony):
On military aid: "By the end of the August, my belief was that if Ukraine did something to demonstrate a serious intention to fight corruption, and specifically addressing Burisma and the 2016 [sic], then the hold on military aid would be lifted."
September 1, Sondland tells Yermak that military aid is conditional on statement: "I told Mr. Yermak that I believed that the resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine took some kind of action on the public statement that we had been discussing for many weeks."
Sondland not disputing Holmes recollection of his phone call w/ President Trump. Says Trump made his dislike of Ukraine clear even earlier, in May 23rd meeting.
Watch: Schiff getting into "official act" and "thing of value" semantics with Sondland, part of the definition of bribery under U.S. law law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18…
🚨 "President Trump never told me directly that the aid was conditioned on the meetings," says Sondland. "The aid was my own personal guess, based on again, your analogy: 2+2=4."
GOP counse Castor is jumping on the lack of explicit quid-pro-quo direction to Sondland from Trump.
Sondland, like Volker, is claiming he didn't make the connection between Biden and Burisma until "very late in the game." He also denied Holmes testimony about July 26th call. Holmes said Sondland mentioned the "Biden investigation."
Sondland bolstering Democrats' obstruction article, says Pompeo, Perry, Brian McCormick (Perry's COS), Mulvaney, Robert Blair (WH aide) and other staffers that refused to testify would likely provide additional information to the inquiry. "I think they would [provide more info]."
Trump's prepped response (Mark Wilson from Getty)
Giuliani appears to have tweeted, and deleted, the following:
Backpats and hugs for Dem Counsel Daniel Goldman, visible through an anteroom door.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Harry Cramer

Harry Cramer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HarrisonCramer

Aug 14, 2020
BREAKING: Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf (and Ken Cucinelli) are ineligible to be serving in their current roles because they were appointed illegally, the GAO rules. drive.google.com/file/d/1BCR-Yl… ImageImage
The ruling is based on the botched handoff to Wolf's predecessor, Kevin Mcaleenan, thus making Wolf's appointment also unlawful. This ruling is going to boost some legal groups making the same arguments: nationaljournal.com/s/708747/legal… Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(