Ed Conway Profile picture
Nov 20, 2019 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Today on #CampaignCheck a look inside the Liberal Democrat manifesto. How would they manage to finance one of the biggest fiscal giveaways in modern history without borrowing a single penny? Short answer: a fair bit of financial jiggery-pokery libdems.org.uk/plan
Let's start with this. The LibDems have gratifyingly published their workings and this is the main table. In the left column is a lot of extra spending (14bn for universal childcare! 10bn on schools! 7.7bn on the NHS!). On the right is how they intend to pay for that spending... Image
Here's same table in chart form. Top bar is revenues. Bottom bar is spending. Somehow the LibDems manage to fund ALL their extra spending through revenues. But here's the thing, only a little over half of that revenue is what you'd traditionally call revenues (dark blue bit)... Image
That dark blue bit is tax revenue. 1p on income tax, some big changes to CGT, increase in corp tax, even duties from legalised cannabis. But that only gets you so far: about £37bn of the £64bn they say they're raising in total. Where does the rest come from...? Two part answer: Image
1: the "remain bonus". It's a wee bit, well, odd to see this put in the revenue column alongside actual tax increases, because it's based on an economic forecast, and therefore is hardly assured. Still, it's not half as odd as the second thing in there - that green bit... Image
2. That green bit is the 2019 spending round. Why's it in the REVENUES bar when it's spending? Because the LibDems effectively want to CANCEL the Tory spending round and replace it with their own plans. THAT'S how they get their balanced budget. Image
That's fine & all but upshot is that a lot of the spending in that bottom bar is actually re-announced versions of what the Tories have announced - and begun to implement. Eg 20k more police, more NHS funding. LibDems will go further. But not quite as far as they'd have you think Image
One in every five pounds the LibDems are today promising to spend is, in fact, OLD MONEY. Already promised. Some of it already spent. In effect they're just reannouncing it. This is 🤨, esp since LDs want to position themselves as the party of fiscal responsibility #CampaignCheck
I was a bit unfair last night abt the LibDem spending plans. They insist dept spending will NOT be lower than existing Tory plans in ANY dept. Only area they'll spend less is on Brexit prep. 1 in 5 pounds of what they're promising is nonetheless "recycled" from spending round
Final thing on LibDem manifesto. They're not really planning to hypothecate their taxes (eg NHS spending to be paid for specifically out of the penny on income tax). Those are ILLUSTRATIVE numbers. After all, hypothecation is almost always a bonkers idea and I think they get that

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Conway

Ed Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdConwaySky

Jul 20
🧵
80 years ago today, newspapers in Europe carried news of the unexpected death of a very important man, in a hotel miles from the nearest city.
A man who, said some, was helping the Allies win the war.
But there was a twist to the tale. The man in question wasn't actually dead Image
That man was John Maynard Keynes. The 61 year old economist was at the Mount Washington Hotel in New Hampshire for what became known as the Bretton Woods conference. And the day earlier he had indeed collapsed, following a heart attack. It was a moment of high drama. Image
The conference had already overrun.
It was supposed to be done in two weeks and there was talk that the delegates would soon be kicked out of the hotel. This was, to put it lightly, a problem.
After all, in the absence of an agreement there was a chance of yet another world war Image
Read 29 tweets
Jul 10
It says something about how confusing Labour's green investment policies are that seemingly even the Treasury has misunderstood them.
Contrary to what the picture in this press release👇 suggests, the National Wealth Fund has nothing to do with wind power or indeed green energy
Instead it's very specifically designed to focus on all the low or zero carbon technologies that AREN'T really to do with generating power.
- Green steel
- Hydrogen
- Clusters
- Gigafactories
Here's the sectors the institution will focus on 👇 Image
Simple way to think abt this:
Pretty much ALL heavy industry today emits carbon, directly or indirectly. The techniques we use to make stuff mostly date back to the industrial revolution. Getting to net zero involves redoing the industrial revolution! edconway.substack.com/p/yet-another-…
Read 7 tweets
Jul 5
🧵
How did Keir Starmer manage to win a landslide majority even though fewer people voted for him than for Jeremy Corbyn in either of his election bids?
A quick thread looking beneath the numbers.
Let’s start with swing…
Election nerds like to focus on two-party swing - essentially showing how voters shifted between the main parties.
And on this metric, Labour enjoyed a MASSIVE swing. 11%. Slightly more than Blair in 1997.
But there’s more to this chart than meets the eye… Image
Let’s take the same data, two-party swing, & break it down. Red bits of bars show change in Labour vote, blue bits show Tory change.
Now look again at that 2024 bar (on the far right).
The vast, vast majority of swing to Labour is in fact swing AWAY from the Conservatives. Image
Read 10 tweets
Jul 2
🧵THE STRANGE CASE OF THE YAKOV GAKKEL🧵
A thread about the energy story no-one wants to talk about.
About how UK companies are helping facilitate Russia, as it earns money to finance its war.
And about how the cost of living crisis didn't end quite how you prob thought it did…
But before all of that it's a story of a ship. A v unusual ship.
The Yakov Gakkel. A vessel that routinely passes these shores. As I type this it's somewhere north of Norway. But I first saw it in the English Channel.
And at first glance you might not think it all that special.. Image
But beneath that enormous blue hull is some incredibly advanced technology. Because the Yakov Gakkel is a cutting edge liquefied natural gas tanker, capable of holding vast amounts of natural gas at temperatures of approximately −163 °C.
These things are pretty incredible! Image
Read 21 tweets
Jul 1
🧵You know the idea, posited by @theIFS, that the main parties are engaged in a "conspiracy of silence" this election.
Their original point was about spending plans.
But I think you cld go much further.
I can think of at least 5 other areas where there's a conspiracy of silence
1⃣Taxes ARE going up under all the main parties' plans.
But they prefer not to talk about this, hiding instead behind the claim that tax rates on income tax, NICs and VAT won't rise. But they've still signed up to plans which will mean the AMOUNT of taxes we're paying will rise. Image
2⃣The magical tax avoidance money tree.
All the parties think they'll raise enormous sums clamping down on tax avoidance.
So much that they need not raise other taxes. This is v uncertain. But since they've all done the same trick they remain silent about its ridiculousness
Read 7 tweets
Jun 23
🧵
You've probably heard this claim - both from @rishisunak and more recently from @Nigel_Farage 👇
UK has leapfrogged others to become the world's fourth biggest exporter! And all after Brexit!
Unfortunately the reality is somewhat less impressive than this sounds.
Here's why: Image
First thing to say is that the bare bones of the claim are certainly true.
Between 2021 and 2022 the UK did indeed rise from 7th in the league table of the world's biggest exporters (counting both goods and services) to 4th.
We'll get to why this happened in a moment. But still Image
However here's some (very) important context.
It's not like the UK has only JUST hit fourth spot. In fact, it was in 4th place in 2020. And in 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Actually if you look at the modal average of our position in the past decade it was... fourth. Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(