Today on #CampaignCheck a look inside the Liberal Democrat manifesto. How would they manage to finance one of the biggest fiscal giveaways in modern history without borrowing a single penny? Short answer: a fair bit of financial jiggery-pokery libdems.org.uk/plan
Let's start with this. The LibDems have gratifyingly published their workings and this is the main table. In the left column is a lot of extra spending (14bn for universal childcare! 10bn on schools! 7.7bn on the NHS!). On the right is how they intend to pay for that spending...
Here's same table in chart form. Top bar is revenues. Bottom bar is spending. Somehow the LibDems manage to fund ALL their extra spending through revenues. But here's the thing, only a little over half of that revenue is what you'd traditionally call revenues (dark blue bit)...
That dark blue bit is tax revenue. 1p on income tax, some big changes to CGT, increase in corp tax, even duties from legalised cannabis. But that only gets you so far: about £37bn of the £64bn they say they're raising in total. Where does the rest come from...? Two part answer:
1: the "remain bonus". It's a wee bit, well, odd to see this put in the revenue column alongside actual tax increases, because it's based on an economic forecast, and therefore is hardly assured. Still, it's not half as odd as the second thing in there - that green bit...
2. That green bit is the 2019 spending round. Why's it in the REVENUES bar when it's spending? Because the LibDems effectively want to CANCEL the Tory spending round and replace it with their own plans. THAT'S how they get their balanced budget.
That's fine & all but upshot is that a lot of the spending in that bottom bar is actually re-announced versions of what the Tories have announced - and begun to implement. Eg 20k more police, more NHS funding. LibDems will go further. But not quite as far as they'd have you think
One in every five pounds the LibDems are today promising to spend is, in fact, OLD MONEY. Already promised. Some of it already spent. In effect they're just reannouncing it. This is 🤨, esp since LDs want to position themselves as the party of fiscal responsibility #CampaignCheck
I was a bit unfair last night abt the LibDem spending plans. They insist dept spending will NOT be lower than existing Tory plans in ANY dept. Only area they'll spend less is on Brexit prep. 1 in 5 pounds of what they're promising is nonetheless "recycled" from spending round
Final thing on LibDem manifesto. They're not really planning to hypothecate their taxes (eg NHS spending to be paid for specifically out of the penny on income tax). Those are ILLUSTRATIVE numbers. After all, hypothecation is almost always a bonkers idea and I think they get that
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵THE STRANGE CASE OF THE ONE MILLION POUND FINE
The story of an obscure press release on an obscure website which begs intriguing questions about Britain's "unprecedentedly tough" sanctions regime & why perhaps it's not quite as tough as it looks.
You may find it unsettling
👇
Back in Aug 2023, HMRC published this notice in the bowels of its website. Don't worry if it doesn't ring a bell - it didn't get any publicity.
But it's a big deal. A £1m fine for breaking Russian sanctions rules.
The single biggest fine in relation to trade sanctions.
But there are some gaping questions about this fine.
First: who paid it? Is this a firm we've heard of? Second: what did they actually do wrong? And what did they do to deserve to pay such a large sum?
There are no answers on the website. That's it. Here's why this matters.
🇨🇳I was rather hoping to be writing this from China, where the Chancellor has just landed for the most significant economic mission in ages - restarting Britain's formal economic relationship with China.
Alas I'm still in London.
But make no mistake; this visit is a BIG deal.
🧵
Why?
Because this is the first such trip since 2017.
UK econ relations with China have been getting frostier for 6 yrs or more.
Huawei have been thrown out; rules imposed on Chinese businesspeople; accusations of spying.
& around the world nations are imposing tariffs on China.
But the UK is doing something different.
While nearly every other G7 nation has imposed tariffs on Chinese electric cars, the UK hasn't. While most countries are going colder on China (most notably the US), the UK is now cosying up to China. Why?
🔥GAS PRICES🔥
Why are they on the rise again?
Why is Europe (and the UK) deindustrialising at a rapid pace?
Why have we failed (contrary to the conventional wisdom) to increase the amount of non-Russian gas in our system?
Lots of questions. Some answers in my five min primer 👇
This is a big deal - and not widely understood:
The volume of non-Russian gas in the European system is FLAT vs before the Ukraine war.
That's not the conventional wisdom.
Back in 2022 many assumed imported LNG would help make up the lost gas from Russia.
That didn't happen...
Instead what happened is subtly, but importantly, different.
Yes, the amount of LNG coming in from the US rose quite sharply - albeit from a low base.
But that rise was only enough to compensate for the fact that domestic production in the UK/EU was FALLING at the same time
🌾 VERTICAL FARMING🌾
Could it save the world?
I used to be sceptical. There are MANY challenges.
But then I visited one. & I'm no longer so sure.
So with the world facing future food crises here's a thread on the most interesting thing to happen to farming in a long time...
🧵
Let's start with a chart.
A few weeks ago I did a deep data dive into the state of farming in the UK.
It culminated with a v long-run chart suggesting our ability to grow ever more crops in a given hectare is slowing. Possibly stalling.
This is a really big deal
What if we could send the line in that chart 👇into the stratosphere?
It would have massive consequences. We'd be able to get ever more food from a relatively small section of land. Meaning more land for housing/rewilding or whatever else we'd want to use it for. But how?
If you're interested in energy/climate you've probably heard the nugget that "kerosene/crude oil helped save the whales", by reducing demand for whale oil in lanterns.
I've even trotted it out myself🤦♂️
But there's a problem with it. A BIG problem...
🧵
The backstory here begins 200 years ago, before the age of crude oil & electricity, when the best way to light a room was a lantern, and the best oil to burn in that lantern was oil from a sperm whale.
It burnt brighter and with less smoke or stink than other oils
The oil itself is found in the head of the sperm whale. It comes from a totally unique organ whose function remains a matter of debate - the spermaceti organ.
Whale oil is a long chain molecule unlike nearly anything else in the natural world, giving it unique qualities
If you're even half interested in energy, I bet you've seen this chart. I call it The Most Hopeful Chart in the World.
The point? We're embracing renewable power MUCH faster than expected.
Hurrah!
Only problem is, this chart has an evil twin. A chart we really need to discuss
🧵
The Most Hopeful Chart in the World shows how each year the @IEA predicted that the amount of solar output around the world would plateau or rise v slowly in the following years. But instead solar output defied all expectations, rising exponentially.
That's great news.
But making solar panels is an energy-intensive exercise.
You need a lot of coal to smelt down the silicon and a lot of power to turn metallurgical silicon into polysilicon, let alone the monocrystalline boules you really need for a decent solar module (read my book for more 📖)