Also, mini-thread on the GOP and particularly Stefanik's other stupid point about Obama and Ukraine. I was super-critical of Obama's decision, so I'm not just covering for Obama here. It was a bad decision, but it wasn't illogical and fit with Obama's (bad) policy. /1
First, the Americans had real concerns about the previous regime, and whether weapons would get to the people who needed them. Second, Obama (rightly or wrongly) was concerned about escalating the conflict before negotiations had been played out. (Wrongly, in my view.). /2
Third, some of our European allies were worried about the same thing, and wanted more time. Obama assumed Clinton would win - bad call - and deal with it as an ongoing issue. Finally, Obama was focused (wrongly) on the Iran deal and didn't want Russia to trash it. /3
These were all bad calls by Obama. Fair enough. But in 2017, Congress wanted it done, and Trump signed off on it. He then did *vastly* more damage by holding the aid anyway to make the point that "America" doesn't help its friends, Donald Trump helps *his* friends. /4
This was maximum damage: Trump signed off on the aid, but then secretly held it back, showing that "he didn't give a shit about Ukraine," that he fears Russia far more than Obama ever did, and that U.S. national security runs a distant second to Donald Trump's personal gain. /5x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Unrelated to the specific kerfuffle in my TL, here's a thought.
If you are inclined to believe that snotty blue checks don't engage people, do not complain when said blue check engages everyone as best he can.
There's one of me, many of you responding. /1
If you're telling me what to answer, what subjects to cover, or that you think I'm just here to "stir the pot" or other accusations of bad faith, I'll just block you to clear out the TL. I've had enough of that, thankyouverymuch.
I do my best to respond as much as I can. /2
My life would be a lot easier and more fun to just respond to the attaboys or just ignore all comments entirely, but that's never been my approach.
If you don't like the subject, then mute the thread, stop following, or turn off Twitter. You are grownups and have that power.
/3
This was a group of very senior guys, GO/FO level some of them, and I snapped off a few shots of them. My man General Crackdown in the middle was not happy, as you can see.
I pulled the fill roll and made my mom stick it in her bra while was approached by an officer. /1
He, uh, told me to hand it over and come with him. I told him I didn't speak Russian. He switched to German. I told him I didn't speak German, either, but probably shouldn't have admitted I knew it was German. /2
My mother had no idea where she was in Moscow but I told her: "Film in bra, head away from me, I'll catch up."
The officer gave up and I started speaking English *loudly* and waving like Gomer Pyle and walked away. Mom and I made it to the Metro. /3
In this piece, @Jbarro notes my frustration with people who will not vote to save democracy because they're worried about inflation. I take the point, but I have *always* felt this way about voters reacting to stuff that presidents don't control. /1
In fact, one of the reasons I became a Republican in the late 70s was that I grew up in a blue collar area where people thought it was the responsibility of the President to find a job for every wage-earner, which isn't the way it works. (And I heard that a lot.) /2
I pleaded with people: You have mayors, state reps, governors. State government. You have to vote at the national level for things of national importance and solve local stuff at the local level. But nope. /3
I read this piece recommended by @JVLast on how participating in the 1/6 insurrection ruined three lives. I read it trying to summon compassion, as he suggested we all do.
And yet, I'm struggling. /1
@JVLast There's a lot in the piece about protecting people from the consequences of free speech, vulnerable and gullible people. But the only way I can agree with that is to just give up on human agency and accept that a paternal state should have kept these people out of trouble. /2
@JVLast I don't know how to do that. I've always lived with pride in a country that never fears free speech, especially not if it's just nincompoopery writ large. (I don't even like hate speech codes.) So to feel compassion, I have to think of these people as no better than children. /3
I've been busy all day, but catching up on the Great Mask Outrage confirms to me that
- Americans are terrible at risk assessement
- The goalposts for public health mandates have, for some people, now moved from "temporary emergency measures" to "because you might get a cold" /1
The people who are implying I am a heartless cad (which I am, but not on this) weren't here when I was taking rafts of shit from MAGA world about masking up, locking down, and getting vaxed. All of which I have affirmed with vigor.
But emergencies are not permanent. /2
Wear a mask in the shower if you want to. But it is *bad public policy* to create mandates that the public eventually just tunes out, for reasons ranging from symbolism to incoherence. I just drove through four states that all had different requirements, include *town* rules. /3