, 3 tweets, 1 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
A lot of ways to interpret this, WAPO is trying to spin it like the FISA was proper and legal when the statement seems to be trying to say the falsified evidence didn't impact the FISA either way, but that's BS because why falsify evidence at all and what else was falsified?
Seeing as how WAPO has had to correct a FISA leak story once already this month I guess we'll just have to wait to find out what the truth really is, because that excuse is ludicrous.
Also, if the DOJ was saying that Horowitz found the FISA application was legal and proper and truthful THAT would be breaking news not a throway line in an article. Sloppy spin and weird leaks. 48 @HNIJohnMiller rule is in full effect now for me.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Shem Horne

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!