Murali Krishnan Profile picture
Nov 24, 2019 32 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Sr. Adv. Abhishek Manu Singhvi arrives in Supreme Court for Maharashtra hearing. @htTweets Image
Bhagwan Das road cordoned off from Tilak Marg side ahead of #Maharashtra hearing in Supreme Court. Image
#MaharashtraHearing: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal have also reached Supreme Court. @htTweets
#Maharashtra: Bench assembles, hearing commences in Supreme Court.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Kapil Sibal arguing for Shiv Sena.

In this case, pre-poll alliance broke down. So we are dealing with post-poll alliance, Sibal. @htTweets
#MaharashtraPolitics: A post poll alliance between Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress was announced at 7 pm and announcement was made that it will stake claim to form govt.

Next morning, President's rules is revoked at 5.47 am and Fadnavis is sworn in at 8 am, Sibal.
#Maharashtra: Governor's actions smacks of bias, is malafides, Sibal submits.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Shiv Sena asks SC to order floor test today.

If they have majority, let them display it, says Sibal.
#Maharashtra: Sibal citing 2018 Karnataka assembly election case and the Supreme Court order in that case.

In that case, SC had cut short 15 days given by Governor to BJP for floor test and asked them to prove majority in 48 hours.
#Maharashtra: Mukul Rohatgi appears for BJP MLAs. Says no fundamental right violation in this case

Why should matter be heard on Sunday, asks Rohatgi.
#MaharashtraCrisis: Solicitor General says he was served copy of petition at 11.30 pm yesterday. Copy of petition was served on me as representative of Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.
#Maharashtra: SG Tushar Mehta asks why have the petitioners bypassed Article 226 jursidction of High Court. They should have approached High Court, submits Mehta.
#Maharashtra: People of Maharashtra need a government.

BJP does not want to hold floor test soon because they want to use intervening period for something else. They did it in Karnataka, Sibal.
#Maharashtra: If they have majority let them prove it. We are ready to prove it tomorrow itself, Sibal.
#Maharashtra: Sr Adv. AM Singhvi now making submissions.
#Maharashtra: 54 is the total numbers of NCP. 41 people have signed resolution stating they are not with Ajit Pawar, Singhvi submits.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Floor test is the best way to decide these things, submits AM Singhvi placing reliance on SR Bommai judgment. @htTweets
#MaharashtraPolitics: Singhvi reading out the order of SC in 2018 Karnataka case giving modalities to be followed for floor test.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Justice Ramana posing questions on timeline followed when Supreme Court ordered floor test.

Singhvi now citing the order in Uttarakand case.
#Maharashtra: 41 people have signed the resolution that they are not with Ajit Pawar and he still claims he has 54 MLAs, Singhvi.
#MaharashtraPolitics: How is it possible for anyone claiming majority yesterday to shy away from floor test today on the ground that they received petition only at 11.30 pm.

Floor test should happen irrespective of all these, Singhvi submits.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Rohatgi commences arguments for BJP MLAs.

Notice should be issued, time should be given for respondents to reply, there is no hurry, Rohatgi.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Can a Constitutional functionary be ordered to hold floor test within a particular time. All the orders cited by petitioners are incorrect, Rohatgi.
#MaharashtraPolitics: No judicial review possible of Governor's individual discretion. The action of Governor immune under Article 361, Rohatgi argues.
#MaharashtraPolitics: The issue that Governor cannot appoint anybody is settled law, Justice Ramana.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Can this court direct Governor to advance floor test, Rohatgi asks.

We dont know what order Governor has passed, Bench.

Yes, so they should take time and come up with those orders. Instead they have disturbed Suprene Court on Sunday, Rohatgi.
#MaharashtraPolitics: The House respects the Court, the Court should respect the House.

Can Legislature come out with an order that Supreme Court should dispose of all cases in two years, Rohatgi asks.
#MaharashtraPolitics: The petition is not maintainable. Petition has no annexures. They were sleeping for three weeks and suddenly they wake up and ask Supreme Court to pass orders, Rohatgi.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Two or three days should be given by the Court to bring all facts on record on affidavit, Rohatgi.
#MaharashtraPolitics: We must get time to reply and we must be allowed to spend rest of the Sunday in peace, Rohatgi.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Supreme Court passing order now.

Issue involved in the writ petition is whether Governor's decision dated Nov 23 is unconstitutional.

Need to peruse order before passing any order.

SC orders Solicitor General Tushar Mehta to produce order of Governor.
#MaharashtraPolitics: Next hearing on matter tomorrow. Order on floor test only after seeing orders of Governor. @htTweets

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Murali Krishnan

Murali Krishnan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @legaljournalist

May 17, 2021
A late night sitting by Kolkata High Court to cancel interim bail granted to two sitting State ministers, one MLA and one former Mayor.
Calcutta* High Court not Kolkata. The chartered High Court legacy.
More interesting news. This was not an appeal against the lower court order but a plea for transfer of trial under Section 407 CrPC.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 21, 2020
Sudarshan News and media regulation: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.

Centre has filed a fresh affidavit calling for regulation of digital media before the court takes up issue of regulation of TV channels.
Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi is appearing on behalf News Broadcasters Federation which has sought impleadment in the matter.
Rohatgi says NBF is the largest body of tv channels in India with 160 members from different parts of the country.

He submits News Broadcasters Association is not representative of news channels and seeks permission to file an affidavit to put forth a self-regulatory mechanism.
Read 18 tweets
Sep 18, 2020
Hearing against Sudarshan News commences before the Supreme Court.
Sanjay Hegde enters appearance on behalf of Zakaf Foundation of India.

"I have a watching brief in this matter. We are not a party to this matter," says Hegde.
Justice DY Chandrachud tells Hegde that Sudarshan News has raised substantial issues against Zakaf Foundation.

"But we are not here to investigate into your client. But Sudarshan News has sought to justify their programme on the grounds of your source of funding"
Read 42 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News and UPSC Jihad: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.
Sr. Counsel Anoop Chaudhuri appearing for petitioner says Sudarshan news has filed an affidavit with vague allegations and submits he wants to file a rejoinder.
Shyam Divan says it was difficult to file a detailed affidavit in two days. We (lawyers) are all in different locations.
We were ambushed by various applications/ interventions, he submits.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News files affidavit before Supreme court defending its programme Bindas Bol and the use of the term "UPSC Jehad".

The affidavit largely focuses on foreign funding received by Zakat Foundation, an orgnisation which supports civil service aspirants.
Sudarshan News has claimed that some such funds received by Zakat Foundation are from terror-linked organisations.

The organisations/ individuals named in the affidavit are Madina Trust, Muslim Aid (UK), Zakat Foundation of America and Zakir Naik
The affidavit says the TV channel has no ill-will against any particular community or individual and do not oppose selection of any meritorious candidate

"There is no statement or message in the four episodes broadcast thatmembers of a particular community should not join UPSC"
Read 8 tweets
Sep 15, 2020
Supreme Court raises grave concerns about the manner in which debates are conducted by certain television channels.

Justice KM Joseph says many times panellists are not allowed to speak and anchor takes up most of the time and panellists are also half-muted.
Supreme Court berates Sudarshan news.

Here is one anchor who says one particular community is trying to gain access to UPSC. Can anything be more insidious than such claims. Such allegations affect stability of country and also casts aspersions on credibility of exam.
In the UPSC exam, all are subject to same tests, interviews and are assessed by same persons. But the insinuation is one community is trying to infiltrate the UPSC. Can such allegations without factual basis be allowed, asks Justice DY Chandrachud?
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(