Your monthly reminder that your body contains thousands of enzymes and scores of coenzymes that keep everything running. In general, vitamins are dietary components that allow cells to make coenzymes. Coenzymes are essential to the health of every organ system in your body. /1
Recommended daily allowances (RDAs) were developed to avoid deficiencies and do not speak to potential benefits of higher levels. Additionally, the fact that coenzymes keep everything running doesn't necessarily mean that you would benefit from the corresponding vitamin. /2
For example, riboflavin and pantothenate are the vitamin precursors of FAD and coenzyme A and you'd be sick if your diet somehow had no riboflavin or pantothenate but there's limited value of megadosing with these vitamins. /3
NAD & its breakdown products including B3 vitamins (NA, NAM & NR) are in our diet. The NAD deficiency, pellagra, is uncommon because NA & NAM are supplemented into processed foods and because most of us don't have the corn rations & lard diet that produced pellagra 100 yrs ago./4
There is a use case for B3s however. Research shows lower cancer incidence in people taking higher levels of NAM and improved cholesterol in people taking higher levels of NA. Most of the NR research is still in animals but it shows that NAD comes under attack in multiple... /5
conditions of metabolic stress (overeating, alcohol use, noise-induced hearing loss, heart failure, nerve and brain damage) and is typically accompanied by increased expression of the NR gene pathway. In these conditions, NR restores NAD and helps a tissue repair itself. /6
More research is needed but people should be assured that those of us who developed NR provide material (NIAGEN) to ~200 preclinical & clinical research groups worldwide for investigation. By better understanding NAD-dependent mechanisms and biomarkers, it is our hope that ... /7
we can add to the peer-reviewed safety dossier and establish efficacy in inflammatory, fatty liver, heart, kidney and neuro and other indications. Thanks for your support of #NADtwitter
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
today @davidasinclair is telling the world that he has achieved age reversal with chemical cocktails
he submitted the paper on June 30 & it was accepted on July 4 by a journal of which he is coeditor-in-chief
paper was sent to me 3 days ago by a reporter for comment
reporter was told it is a "groundbreaking study" & "the first chemical approach to reprogram cells to a younger state"
reason WSJ didn't cover that paper is that ppl have been reporting chemical compounds that drive conversion of cells to induced pluripotency for the last 10-15 years
all of the compounds in today's paper were previously reported by others, mostly in 2013
there's a peer review failure today doi.org/10.1016/j.cell… in which an individual with 59 collaborators claims to have tested the information theory of aging
he did not test the information theory of aging
the claim is that he induced dsDNA breaks that are easily repaired, don't cause a DNA damage response or mutagenesis or cell death--only an epigenetic change
he knows this is not true because his co-first author & he published this paper in dec '21
there are a few issues being addressed here. let’s start w safety
human placebo controlled trials have never shown adverse events attributable to Niagen. note that LDL-C is raised in humans w Basis & pterostilbene alone
the class of compounds to which NR belongs is vitamin B3
there are decades of human data on these molecules showing human safety. niacin is unique in causing flushing but nicotinamide was tested in large Australian skin cancer and was shown to be cancer-preventative in ppl
there’s a hierarchy of evidence w human RCTs (and meta-analysis of RCTs) on the top. human case reports & good quality rodent studies are lower. cell studies are lower. poorly conducted rodent and/or poorly conducted cell studies are garbage in/garbage out