, 4 tweets, 1 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
Needs a careful study to determine relative relevance of "white," "male," and "Boomer," checking off confounds with political affiliation and political identity.
I'm not saying it's right. I am saying a scientist should be a wee bit better at isolating relevant variables and speaking circumspectly around them than we see in this tweet.
Not saying the PhD candidate in question is guilty here, but it would behoove scientists who want their work taken as seriously as it deserves to all join in the fight for objective truth and against epistemological situatedness (standpoint epistemology) in a consistent way.
Update: PhD candidate in question probably is guilty here.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with James Lindsay

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!