, 19 tweets, 14 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
1. A thread on a speech today by Solicitor General, Noel Francisco, at @TheJusticeDept summit urging legislative amendment of the Administrative Procedure Act, and further Trump administration-led ‘regulatory reforms.’ justice.gov/opa/speech/sol…

Here's the speech's key paragraph:
@TheJusticeDept 2. First, 2 points for context: this speech occurs against a backdrop in which the Trump administration has been a serial violator of the Administrative Procedure Act, the worst I have seen by a 1st-term president in my 25+ years practicing environmental & administrative law.
@TheJusticeDept 3. Commentators on the right & left agree the Trump administration’s track record in court is abysmal when it comes to following the Administrative Procedure Act. washingtonpost.com/world/national… & propublica.org/article/presid…

A 6% court victory rate.
@TheJusticeDept 4. Second, even industry proponents of deregulation realize the Trump “administration has given regulatory reform a bad name” because it is so disdainful of administrative law and crazed & sloppy about deregulation. washingtonpost.com/world/national…
@TheJusticeDept 5. So, I cannot help but observe, wryly, that I bet the Trump admin. DOES want to amend this law that they have violated so often & so egregiously.

The Trump admin. is almost uniquely situated to be an unconvincing proponent for regulatory reform & legislative reform of the APA.
@TheJusticeDept 6. The SG mentions “numerous legislative proposals that have been made— & in some cases passed by the House—to reform the APA.” What he doesn’t say is a GOP House passed these before 2018. Democrats fiercely opposed the bills & they aren't being taken up by a Democratic majority.
@TheJusticeDept 7. Some Republicans & industry lobbyists are pushing APA reform bills to mire agency rulemakings for safeguards in cumbersome, costly trial-type or formal rulemakings that critics decry as obsolete & ineffectual. theregreview.org/2017/08/21/lev…
@TheJusticeDept 8. Other GOP bills promote distorted & biased benefit-cost analysis & outcomes, for example “require[ing] agencies to choose the lowest-cost regulatory option”—for industry & corporations—"and not the option that maximizes net benefits to” to Americans. policyintegrity.org/files/media/Re…
@TheJusticeDept 9. Yet other GOP bills eliminate longstanding judicial doctrines for reviewing agencies’ statutory interpretations, letting judges substitute their views for agencies’ expertise & agencies' reasonable interpretations of statutes. republicans-judiciary.house.gov/wp-content/upl… & nrdc.org/sites/default/…
@TheJusticeDept 10. I testified against this House GOP bill, The Separation of Powers Restoration Act of 2016,” observing that the bill’s sponsors plainly were motivated by hostility to regulations, safeguards & protections for the public, rather than lofty concerns for separation of powers.
@TheJusticeDept 11. The SG speech alludes to all three of these GOP bills, but without hinting at their hyper-partisan origins & agendas, the strong objections they have faced, & their harmful consequences for legal protections for workers, consumers, public health & the environment.
@TheJusticeDept 12. Speech continues, noting Trump admin.’s focus on “significant regulatory reforms,” “such as limiting the practice of rulemaking by guidance.”

This can only prompt a cynical chuckle from anyone familiar w/ Trump @EPA & its 3-year rampage rolling back safeguards via guidance.
@TheJusticeDept @EPA 13. The Trump @EPA has issued TWENTY deregulatory guidance documents under just ONE Clean Air Act program, so perhaps the Solicitor General or Trump needs to pick up the phone to call @EPAAWheeler to rebuke his guidance frenzy. epa.gov/nsr/new-source…
@TheJusticeDept @EPA @EPAAWheeler 14. The core paragraph in the SG speech ends by noting Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen “will deliver a keynote address discussing the Department’s reform plans in greater depth.”

I will look forward to reading it.
@TheJusticeDept @EPA @EPAAWheeler 15. In the meantime, what do we know about Mr. Rosen’s views on “regulatory reform.”

He is a proponent of “regulatory budgets,” reflected in a Trump executive order, to constrain agencies' implementation of federal statutes by adopting safeguards. brookings.edu/research/the-l…
@TheJusticeDept @EPA @EPAAWheeler 16. Trump admin. “has issued very few new regulations,” ignoring pressing & emerging problems like climate change, PFAs, asbestos, ethylene oxide, other toxic chemicals & pesticides. Regulatory budgets give short shrift to *benefits*, statutory mandates & ultimately Rule of Law.
@TheJusticeDept @EPA @EPAAWheeler 17. Rosen, in Bush DOT “testified about participating in the termination of 180 potential rules.” eenews.net/stories/106009…
At WH OMB, he strongly opposed EPA regulation of GHGs & was there during tragi-comic episode when OMB refused to open EPA emails w/ GHG endangerment finding.
@TheJusticeDept @EPA @EPAAWheeler 18. The Solicitor General’s speech casts the need for Trump administration-led “regulatory reforms” & a push for legislative amendments to the Administrative Procedure Act as simply a matter of “modernizing and improving the APA.” justice.gov/opa/speech/sol…
@TheJusticeDept @EPA @EPAAWheeler 19. Against this backdrop of hostile & partisan attacks on safeguards via GOP legislation & Trump rollbacks, let’s acknowledge there will be healthy skepticism about these reform agendas.

Because we’ve seen it all before—and it seems to be pushing the same old, unhealthy agenda.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with John Walke

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!