A 70 y/o man presents with new exertional dyspnea, orthopnea/PND, wide pulse pressure (~100 mm Hg), and elevated JVP. A physical finding is identified (video). Echo: preserved systolic function, no valvular disease. Thoughts? What would you do next? #PhysicalExam#cardiotwitter
Incredible discussion. Like many here I questioned the echo. Then realized Quincke's pulse = high-output state (not always AR). Sent for RHC to confirm high-output HF. Sure enough, CO was 12.5 L/min (CI 4.8 L/min/m2). Workup for cause underway. #PhysicalExam led to diagnosis.
Physical exam was pivotal in this case. Without it, most of us would have concluded that this was "just another case of diastolic heart failure" and stopped there. Without seeing Quincke's pulse, there is no question that I would have unknowingly marched down the wrong path.
At this point thiamine deficiency (beriberi) and AV shunt are highest on my differential. Patient drinks ~2 glasses of wine/day. EtOH causes thiamine deficiency via several mechanisms, so even if patients consume a normal diet and don't appear malnourished, it is still possible.
Thanks @DocRock54 for asking for follow-up. The thiamine assay won't result until 12/22. If negative, then next step will be to look for shunt. I have corresponded with the authors of the excellent review below, who offered some advice about shunt workup (see image). More soon.
UPDATE. This patient has wet beriberi. Thiamine replacement should result in total cure. Heinrich Quincke is still helping patients nearly 100 years after his death. Is that not immortality?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/10
Doctors and nurses are often asked to create “rules” for hospitalized patients with behavioral concerns, including limitations on leaving the unit, being subject to a body search on return, and limitations on visitors.
Here’s why I think that’s a bad idea.
2/10
We can all agree that disruptive behaviors can impact care in a negative way. Imagine we are treating a patient with endocarditis for weeks in the hospital with IV antibiotics. If this patient is using elicit IV drugs during the hospitalization, that is clearly a problem.
3/10
As a doctor, I can provide my opinion that certain behaviors are counterproductive and may even amount to medical futility.
But setting rules for patients is not my job. Here’s why:
1/8 A young man presents with dyspnea. We start with his hands.
My hand is gloved in the second photo (for frame of reference, I can palm a basketball).
Our patient has a finding that should generate a hypothesis.
2/8 Our hypothesis takes us to the patient’s mouth.
3/8 A high-arched palate. Otherwise note as an “ogival” arch. These arches are pointed at the top and are a key feature of Gothic architecture, beginning in the 12th century.
1/11
A 55 y/o man presents for evaluation of chronic diarrhea. We walk into the room to meet him.
We have an opportunity to make an “augenblick” diagnosis – one that can be made in the blink of an eye.
2/11
We listen to his heart to help confirm our hypothesis (best with headphones). There is a holosystolic murmur over the LLSB. Notice that the intensity of the murmur seems to vary in a regular cycle? It gets louder/quieter/louder/quieter. What is the significance of this?
3/11
The augmentation of the murmur during inspiration is known as Carvallo’s sign, and indicates that the abnormal heart sound is coming from the R-side of the heart. Here is a more dramatic example in a different patient with tricuspid stenosis:
1/10
A 26 y/o woman presents with migratory arthritis. Started with a red and hot foot/ankle. Then went to the knee. Overuse, she was told. When ice/rest did not help, she went to the hospital.
An arthrocentesis procedure was performed.
2/10
20K white blood cells but no organisms. She was taken for a washout procedure for presumed septic arthritis.
And when the knee didn't improve, she was taken for another one.
And when she still didn't improve, she was transferred to our hospital.
1/8 You are rotating on the Procedure Service and your team is asked to perform a routine "therapeutic" paracentesis on a patient with cancer. You walk into the room to meet the patient and this is what you see.
This finding should generate a hypothesis.
2/8 A "diagnostic" paracentesis wasn't requested, but the underlying cause of ascites in this case has never been questioned. You consult your framework for ascites:
The first question you want to know is whether the process is driven by portal hypertension or not.
3/8 Serum albumin is 3.1 g/dL and ascitic fluid album is 0.8 g/dL, yielding a serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) of 2.3 (>1.1), which is consistent with a portal hypertensive process.