Maya Forstater Profile picture
Dec 25, 2019 22 tweets 7 min read Read on X
"Allegedly transphobic tweets" thread.

People have been tweeting about my "transphobic tweets" but none have been linking to them. Presumably because those who searched my actual timeline thought 'meh'.

Here are all the tweets that are mentioned in the judgement.
First off, a thread about the government's consultation on the Gender Recognition Act.
Then there was this question, which sparked off quite a big discussion with #developmenttwitter on sex and gender. (about 150 tweets in several threaded conversations)

The judgment quotes five part tweets (and in some cases part sentences) from that discussion
(1) “Bunce does not ‘masquerade as female’ he is a man who likes to express himself part of the week by wearing a dress”.

Here is the full tweet. It is an answer to a question and links to Bunce in Bunce's own words
(2) "Yes. & weird he felt entitled to accept the award, instead of saying "sorry there has been a mistake I am a man who challenges gender norms""

Here is the full tweet
(3) "“He is a part-time cross dresser who mainly goes by the name of Phillip”.

Here is the full tweet
(4) "Yes I think that male people are not women. I don't think being a woman/female is a matter of identity or womanly feelings. It is biology."

Here is the full tweet:
(5) "“Bunce is a white man who likes to dress in women’s clothes”

Here is the full tweet:
The judgement states, the bundle included tweets from Clair Quentin "who alleged the Claimant had retweeted transphobic material."

This is from a thread in which Clair tweeted screengrabs of my tweets calling me an "anti-trans trans hate cultist" and a "far right bigot"
And urged our mutual professional contacts to block me and
Clair said....
The judgement said "A newspaper cartoon of a person flashing two women at “Hampstead Heath Ladies Pond” with the caption “It’s alright – it’s a woman’s penis”.
Here is my tweet. with my words. It is part of a discussion with #legaltwitter about the application of the Equality Act single sex exemptions in relation to Hampstead ponds. The cartoon is from Private Eye
The judgement says I said this
Here is the tweet.

As you can see the second bit quoted is not my words.

Personally I will use preferred pronouns, but I don't think that means there is nothing to talk about here. The article is well worth reading.

The judgement said i said this, again the second bit is not my words.

Here is the tweet
As the judgment says I referred to Gregor Murray as "he" in a tweet in a discussion about Scouting (we are both Scout Leaders)
This was accidental (I forgot). They then reported me to the Scout Association for bigotry & lying (complaint not upheld). I was asked to apologise to Murray for mispronouning. I have said I will, if they apologise for the hurtful & defamatory things they have said about me
j'mnt says: "the Claimant tweeted about her views on tans [sic] women in sport: “Short and to the point by .. “lt is unfair and unsafe for transwomen to compete in women's sport”

Here is the tweet. It is a link to an article by @DebbieHayton a transwoman
And that is it. The extent of my "transphobic tweets" as included in the judgement.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

May 13
The OfS-Sussex judgement is logically flawed and can't be allowed to stand. @ObhishekSaha with a very good analogy about paths.

Sussex's defence was that it had a high level sign saying "this path will only be closed for very good reasons". Therefore it must have had a very good reason 🙄

timeshighereducation.com/opinion/ofs-su…
I really like this footpath analogy...

In order to keep the footpath functionally open the local authority has to apply some rules to the users of the path. It has a duty to keep the path open for cyclists and pedestrians, but not for motorbikes. This is in the bye-laws

(this is the university's equality act compliant equality policy that is part of its governance)
There are some short parts of the path that are so unavoidably narrow that the local authority puts up signs saying "cyclists dismount here" to keep the whole path safe and open for all users.

That is fine, the path is still open to pedestrians and cyclists.

(that's a proportionate means to a legitimate aim in the Equality Act, its "no noisy protests that disrupt exams")
Read 5 tweets
Apr 9
This is quite the exercise in missing the point by Prof Shreya Atrey in Modern Law Review.

FWS will have a severe impact on "transgender, gender fluid, gender non-conforming, polygender, genderqueer and intersex" it says (without defining any of these terms).

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/14…Image
Remember, FWS was just about whether a GRC changes a person's sex for the purpose of the Equality Act.
Atrey says the protected characteristic of sex should be amended to include sex characteristics, gender, gender identity, gender expression and gender performance. 🤨 Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 12
A curious thing about the draft government guidance: It has no conceptual underpinning at all

“In recent years, we have seen a significant increase in the number of children who are questioning the way they feel about being a boy or a girl, including the physical attributes of their sex and the related ways in which they fit into society. “

Er ok…🤷‍♀️
It then dives into “where a child or their parent has raised a request relating to social transition”

The phrase appears 29 times in the guidance, but is never explained what it means or what it might involve.
The schools are told they must "consider what is in the best interests of the child and other children, and a decision relating to social transition may not be the same as a child’s wishes. "
Read 7 tweets
Dec 3, 2025
The judgment in the case of Maria Kelly v Leonardo is out and it is awful.

As bad as James Tayler’s judgment in Forstater v CGDE in 2019 (and just as likely to be turned over on appeal).

gov.uk/employment-tri…Image
The phrase “gender identity” appears 36 times in the judgment Image
Leonardo’s policy is that any member of staff who is proposing to to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process for the purposes of reassigning their gender can use the toilets intended for the opposite sex.

Maria complained and got nowhere. Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 1, 2025
I am hugely grateful to Naomi Cunningham for the work that she has done as the first chair of Sex Matters, and for her equally important role as a barrister representing claimants using the law to fight for justice.

I wish her all the best in her future endeavours.
There is not enough of Naomi to go around... ❤️ Image
Sex Matters board will be led by Interim Chair Dr Emma Hilton
Read 4 tweets
Nov 15, 2025
Melanie Field reading list.

Field worked at the Government Equality Office when the Equality Act was being drafted, and then at the EHRC during the Stonewall years.

(Pictured here soon after leaving the job with Robin White, Stephen Whittle and Nancy Kelley) Image
The day of the Supreme Court's judgment was "long and difficult" for Field who had long promoted a different view of the Equality Act.

Field's big theory is that the the Supreme Court's decision was driven by the problem of pregnant transmen with GRCs... Image
Field wrote in the Guardian about how she disagreed with the Supreme Court.

theguardian.com/world/2025/apr…Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(