, 15 tweets, 39 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie Barr and Durham are lackeys who are trying to divert everyone’s attention from the Mueller report, etc.
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie Barr has been discredited - The Barr letter is a four-page letter sent on March 24, 2019, from Attorney General William Barr to leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees detailing the purported "principal conclusions" of the Mueller Report.
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie After the release of the redacted report, Barr's letter was criticized as a deliberate mischaracterization of the Mueller Report and its conclusions, and as an attempt at spinning the media narrative to undermine Mueller's investigation.
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie Numerous legal analysts concluded that Barr's letter did not accurately portray some of the findings of the investigation, casting Trump in a better light than was intended in the report.
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie The Barr letter omitted information and quoted sentence fragments out of context in ways that significantly altered the findings in the report, including:
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Omission of language that indicated Trump could be subject to indictment after leaving office, inaccurately suggesting that Trump was "totally exonerated".
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Omission of language that indicated Trump could be subject to indictment after leaving office, inaccurately suggesting that Trump was "totally exonerated".
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Omission of words and a full sentence that twice suggested there was knowing and complicit behavior between the Trump campaign and Russians that stopped short of direct coordination, which may constitute conspiracy.
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Barr in his letter took it upon himself to deliver a ruling on whether Trump had committed obstruction, the redacted report indicates that Mueller intended that decision to be made by Congress, not Barr.
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Numerous political and legal analysts, observed significant differences in what Barr said about Mueller's findings in his letter, and in his April 18 press conference, compared to what the Mueller Report actually found.
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Lol, This commentary included a comparison of Barr to Baghdad Bob, calling him "Baghdad Bill".
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Barr wrote that his letter provided "the principal conclusions" of the Mueller Report. Ryan Goodman, a professor at the New York University School of Law and co-editor of Just Security, observed that in 1989,
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Barr also wrote a letter which he stated contained "the principal conclusions" of a controversial legal opinion[which?] he worked on as head of the OLC.
@qAnon5_5 @gregmk12 @suzy_swears @Pacoluismonta9a @JohnMonch @Murfdasurf13 @twit_kung_fu @h8Wankmaggot45 @1980Dorothy @judgingurn @Mike69740911 @Rosie - Barr declined to provide the full opinion to Congress, but it was later subpoenaed and released to the public, showing that the 1989 letter did not fully disclose the principal conclusions. Hmm ...
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Nick Ruggiero

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!