@DeptofDefense@CENTCOM "Safeguarding cultural property while in-theater is not only a legal obligation. It plays a vital role as a force multiplier — winning hearts and minds... by sending the message that the U.S. military is the most respectful and professional fighting force in the world."
@DeptofDefense@CENTCOM@USASOCNews "intentional or gratuitous damage to undefended cultural heritage by invading or occupying forces is expressly forbidden"
@DeptofDefense@CENTCOM@USASOCNews The #1954HagueConvention specifically requires the US to "refrain from any act directed by way of reprisals against cultural property.” (Art. 4.4) It's arguable that the President's threats against #IranianCulturalSites are already a violation of the international law of war.
@DeptofDefense@CENTCOM@USASOCNews This guide for soldiers also warns "because of its emotional context, cultural property is particularly vulnerable in times of conflict. Combatants may exact political retribution by targeting symbols of their enemies’ cultural identity." #SoundsFamiliar
@DeptofDefense@CENTCOM@USASOCNews Also: "[During combat] there is the temptation for wanton looting and destruction for either money or power."
@DeptofDefense@CENTCOM@USASOCNews "All ranks within a unit must be aware of the requirement to protect cultural property. It is equally critical that all commanders up and down the chain of command receive a briefing from the Judge Advocate General (JAG) office on the laws governing cultural property."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2021, a Nepali monastery told the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts that the museum possessed a sacred painting stolen from the monastery in 1967. The museum responded by offering to give the monastery a replica... if they would sign away their rights to the original. A 🧵
In August 1967, the American scholar Mary Slusser photographed the painting during an annual festival at the Yempi Mahavihara (also known as I Baha) in Patan, Nepal. In September, , as her diary shows, a dealer offered it to her.
In Nepal's Buddhist communities, sacred artifacts like the painting are owned jointly by their worshippers. They cannot be sold. Slusser's other writings show she knew this, and knew that it was against Nepal's law to export such artifacts. Still, she bought it.
Arguing that tales of dragons are evidence that dinosaurs lived in human times - humm. Arguing that anything Herodotus says was literal truth - nope. (Nice buff H-man, there, though.)
“by funding scientific studies on Native American human remains… federal agencies have created incentives for institutions to hold on to ancestors in ways that undermine the goals of NAGPRA…”
It’s not that they didn’t think about consulting tribes - it’s that they thought doing so was a bad idea for their research. Holy moly.
Inscriptions friends... is pecking out a circular letter form instead of carving freehand weird for ca. 530 BCE? (Context in next tweet.)
So, John Marshall buys this stele in fragments from 1902-1913: metmuseum.org/art/collection…. Marshall was offering £10 a letter for further fragments of the inscription, or £500 for the rest of it.
In 1907, here's the part of the inscription he has (left) and two more parts he's offered by a dealer in Athens (right). The new parts have the cautious circles.