Yesterday the MS Supreme Court upheld the sentence.
As the concurrence points out, Nash has a wife & three kids who depend on him.
And while both the court and the sentencing judge invoked Nash's criminal history (two priors for burglary), he had no convictions since 2001. 2/
The concurring justice points out that prosecutors & the trial judge trampled justice in this case, though oddly thinks Nash still needs"rehabiliat[ion]" over this. 3/ law.justia.com/cases/mississi…
And the kicker?
One of the prosecutors who sought this draconian sentence, Brian Burns, is now a state court judge. His plans for the new job?
The @sfchronicle reported: "most types of violent crime actually plummeted [in 2020] — and all violent crime rates remain near their lowest levels since 1975.”
What is even arguably the point of this @sfchronicle story? That we should assume anyone who tries to steal a cell phone is going to shoot their mother?
Does it vilify a progressive DA with irrelevant quotes from political opponents? You bet it does!
Does it bury the fact that the assumed premise of the entire article -- Boudin's charging decision led to this outcome -- has no basis in fact whatsoever? Indeed it does.