Bryan Cantrill Profile picture
Jan 12, 2020 19 tweets 3 min read Read on X
So, my thoughts on engineering performance management have always been a bit idiosyncratic, but Matt's tweets today have me reflecting, so... storytime. 1/
An an engineer in a large corporate environment, I had found that performance management never actually improved my own performance. (!) 2/
The things that resulted in my own high performance were the basics: being motivated by the problem; being drawn to the mission; being a part of an incredible team. 3/
Daniel Pink summarizes these motivators concisely: people are motivated by autonomy, mastery, and purpose. 4/
The role of management is in constructing that environment, not micromanaging it. If engineering performance is suffering, it's (likely) a management problem: wrong problem, wrong mission, or wrong team -- or all three. 5/
I elaborated on my thoughts of what was wrong with everything in this talk in 2013 at Surge (RIP): 6/
There are some things I would change in that talk, but I broadly stand by it. In terms of how my thinking has evolved... 7/
I worked with a very open minded director of HR at Joyent; she at first thought I was bonkers, but she was willing to work with me and saw that it worked: the path to highest performance was in stoking intrinsic motivation. 8/
After Samsung acquired Joyent, to their credit, they didn't try to force traditional performance management upon us -- but they also wanted something a little more... formal. 9/
We decided to "formalize" our process by having each engineer engage in a bi-annual reflection, asking them to write down their answers to several questions. 10/
1. What are you most proud of in the last six months?
2. What did you learn?
3. Where did you struggle?
4. What are you anxious about in the coming six months?
5. What are you excited about in the coming six months? 11/
The answers were incredible -- deeply reflective and revealing. It allowed us to sharpen intrinsic motivation, especially with some very surprising answers about what engineers are proud about. 12/
In particular, engineers are not boastful by nature; ask them what they are proud of, and you are likely to learn about a detail of a system that you did not sufficiently appreciate! 13/
My belief was that you could hand the reflections to someone who knew absolutely nothing about the organization or even the technology, and they could (easily) spot the high performers vs. people that we're struggling. 14/
The reflections were a huge win -- and they had nothing to do with OKRs or MBOs or formalized ranking or any other traditional performance management garbage. 15/
So let's not kid ourselves: traditional performance management has nothing to do with improving performance -- and everything to do with middle management claiming responsibility for that performance. 16/
If you want a high performing team, get back to the basics; your job as an engineering leader is to effect Pink's triad in your team: autonomy, mastery, purpose. 17/
The only real performance management to be done is for engineering leaders to ask themselves what they themselves are doing to give their team autonomy, encourage their team's mastery, inspire their team's purpose. 18/
Also, have I mentioned that we're hiring at Oxide? ;) oxide.computer/careers/ 19/19

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bryan Cantrill

Bryan Cantrill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bcantrill

May 27
Long-time A's reporter (and current reporter at @TheAthletic) @melissalockard gave voice to an extraordinary thought this week, one that really has me reflecting; with my apologies, a thread... 1/
Informed by our own experiences raising capital at @oxidecomputer, I have been unable to stop thinking about the acute financing challenges for the A's: John Fisher has assets, but not much in the way of clear cash flow. 2/
@oxidecomputer The terms of SB1 require Fisher to have all cash secured (plus contingencies for a 5-10% overrun) before he can unlock the Nevada money. 3/
Read 19 tweets
Apr 7
I can no longer contain my thoughts on the A's temporary move to Sacramento, and want to get a couple of things out there. So with my apologies, a thread... 1/
The only thing to know about the A's is that the ownership is INCOMPETENT. I'm not talking routine incompetence -- this is grand, eye-watering, paint-peeling incompetence. When seeking explanations for their actions, don't overthink it: it is INCOMPETENCE every single time. 2/
How does this endure? If a CEO explained a decline in revenue by BLAMING THE CUSTOMERS, the board would (rightfully) fire them. But John Fisher is not a CEO: he is just a grown child -- the only thing he knows how to do is hoard the spoils of his birth. 3/ bcantrill.dtrace.org/2023/11/18/is-…
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(