Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture
@ncdave4life
Jan 20, 2020 • 15 tweets • 160 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @NASA [1/14] It's a strange sort of "acceleration" which manages to avoid affecting the longest, highest-quality measurement records.

There has been slight acceleration compared to the 19th century, but it ended circa 1930. So it's not attributable to anthropogenic GHGs.
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @NASA [2/14] All the best long measurement records show that coastal sea-levels trends have NOT significantly accelerated in >90 years.
sealevel.info/MSL_graph.php?…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @NASA [3/14] The Dutch, for obvious reasons, have been paying close attention to sea-level for a very long time. Their measurements show that there's been no significant acceleration in rate of sea-level rise in response to rising CO2 levels:
sealevel.info/150-061_Maassl…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @NASA [4/14] Venice is one of the very few sites which have measured a statistically significant change in rate of sea-level rise: it DECELERATED slightly (probably because they curtailed groundwater pumping in the 1980s, to reduce subsidence).

sealevel.info/270-054_Venice…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @NASA [5/14] "The secular trend in MSL at venice during the twentieth century was a factor or two greater than at Trieste, which is almost certainly related to local anthropogenic effects including ground water pumping, see for example several publications by P.A.Pirazzoli." -PSMSL
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @NASA [6/14] Trieste, Italy has a quite typical sea-level trend. As you can see, there's been no significant acceleration in the rate of sea-level rise.
sealevel.info/270-061_Triest…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza [7/14] The "global" (i.e. average) sea-level trend is slightly up. But it's so slight that In many places it's dwarfed by local factors, like erosion, sedimentation, and vertical land motion.
@GretaThunberg's town is one such place. There the land rises >3x as fast as the ocean.
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @GretaThunberg [8/14] The place recording sharpest acceleration is Brest, France. Even there it's nearly negligible, for practical purposes. The trend was 0.0 mm/yr in 1800s, but +1.5 mm/yr since 1900 (six inches/century), & no significant acceleration since 1900 (only 0.00483±0.01121 mm/yr²).
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @GretaThunberg [9/14] If you look at places with little or no vertical land motion, the sea-level trends look like these:

● sealevel.info/MSL_graph.php?…

● sealevel.info/MSL_graph.php?…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @GretaThunberg [10/14] Measuring sea-level is straightforward. It's been done accurately for >200 years, in some places.
It's not driven by AGW. CO2 levels have risen (rapidly) for 70 yrs. Temps have been rising (slowly) for 40 yrs. It has NOT measurably affected coastal sea-level trends.
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @GretaThunberg [11/14] Wherever you look, the story is the same: regardless of whether the local sea-level trend is positive or negative, it hasn't accelerated significantly since the 1920s, or before.
sealevel.info/200-030_La_Cor…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @GretaThunberg [12/14] Local sea-level trends vary, due mostly to varying rates of local vertical land motion (subsidence or uplift). But they all show the same lack of significant acceleration in response to rising CO2 levels:
sealevel.info/8724580_Key_We…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @GretaThunberg [13/14] Even at New York City's Battery Park, where land subsidence approximately doubles the rate of sea-level rise, there's been no significant acceleration in rate:
sealevel.info/8518750_The_Ba…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @GretaThunberg [14/14] Where there's no vertical land motion (subsidence or uplift), the trend looks about like this: almost perfectly linear for at least nine decades, with no detectable effect from rising CO2 levels:
sealevel.info/150-021_Harlin…
@Tokyo_Tom @JosephS36875398 @DrSusanBarring1 @JoeTheAtheist @nix_bit @Gladfly1 @KCTaz @OscarsWild1 @Bananenrijperij @insane_voice @BadgersNo @tfer68 @EthonRaptor @dvibrationz @GillesnFio @Vieux_Rhone @badmoonrising11 @ClimatePoet @Schtickery @Kenneth72712993 @AtomsksSanakan @octal_ @Jamz129 @PolAnimalAus @horrdorr @pinangodan @FrankWi74044551 @NikolovScience @AOECOIN @DawnTJ90 @swcrisis @FactFascist @KGrumpallo @stevethib @FrankChanged @DonWils13730132 @ElQuesoSabio @Creamih8 @Vulgar_wit @dltff_ya @MATTP1949 @whyofweb @KnowYourGreen1 @su_js1 @Silence54994655 @TyotoRiffle @Tangomitteckel @AlanBlackMD @ideapalooza @ThreadReaderApp unroll me, please.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton

✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ncdave4life

✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture
Apr 28
1/7》Myles Allen, "Net Zero" promoter.🙄

Net Zero is based on fallacies:

Ⅰ. The fallacy that CO2 & a slightly milder climate are harmful.

Actually, the best evidence compellingly shows CO2 emissions are beneficial, not harmful.


sealevel.info/learnmore.html
co2coalition.org
co2coalition.org
2/7》
Ⅱ. The fallacy that CO2 levels will continue to rise as long as human CO2 emissions continue, even if emissions continue at a reduced rate.
@ShroedingerBird @Willard1951 @Rabs1958 @AlkernS71 @3GHtweets @Veritatem2021 @IsaacCline42 @Anymous84861064 @MarcEHJones @LottRan @GillesnFio @S_D_Mannix @ItsTheAtmospher @navigator087 @Devonian1342 @GAJAJW @BenKoby1911 @Jaisans @bulkbiker @Climatehope2 @DenisDaly @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @priscian @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @BointonGiles @AristotleMrs @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @TheDisproof @MaggieL @Willy1000 @AuroriaTwittori @MartinJBern @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm 3/7》For each 40-50 ppmv rise in CO2 level, net natural CO2 removals accelerate by another 1 ppmv/year.
Read 7 tweets
✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture
Apr 26
@Rabs1958 @AlchemistNinja2 @MarcEHJones @Veritatem2021 @3GHtweets @LottRan @Anymous84861064 @GillesnFio @S_D_Mannix @ItsTheAtmospher @navigator087 @Devonian1342 @GAJAJW @BenKoby1911 @Jaisans @bulkbiker @Climatehope2 @DenisDaly @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @priscian @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @Willard1951 @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @BointonGiles @AristotleMrs @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @TheDisproof @MaggieL @Willy1000 @AuroriaTwittori @MartinJBern @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 1/17. That's false.
2/17. That DeSmogBlog article about Will Happer is a brazen, despicable smear.

DeSmogBlog claimed that "Peabody Energy paid [Happer] $8,000 which was routed through the CO2 Coalition."

That's a LIE. Prof. Happer was not paid, because he asked that his entire fee be donated to charity.
3/17. DeSmog also falsely claimed, "Happer told Greenpeace reporters that he would be willing to produce research promoting the benefits of carbon dioxide for $250 per hour, while the funding sources could be similarly concealed by routing them through the CO2 Coalition."

That's ANOTHER LIE.

Happer did no such thing. Rather, he was asked to produce a white paper (which is not "research") explaining the best scientific evidence about the costs and benefits of fossil fuel use—and he generously asked that the fee for that work be donated to charity.

The CO2 Coalition @CO2Coalition is a 501(c)(3) educational charity. Happer didn't "route" anything "through" them. He very generously donated the fees to which he was entitled, to that very worthy charity.
Read 17 tweets
✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture
Apr 22
@Willard1951 @MarcEHJones @GillesnFio @AGW_is_bad @Devonian1342 @Rabs1958 @Anvndarnamn5 @jpgcrowley @mikeshearn49 @Anymous84861064 @ItsTheAtmospher @navigator087 @GAJAJW @BenKoby1911 @Jaisans @bulkbiker @Climatehope2 @DenisDaly @S_D_Mannix @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @priscian @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @BointonGiles @AristotleMrs @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @TheDisproof @MaggieL @Willy1000 @AuroriaTwittori @MartinJBern @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 1/7. That's nonsense, Willard. We've discussed this topic and that graph before, have you forgotten?
2/7. The improvement in agricultural productivity in Africa is not "very, very modest." It is real, and it is spectacular.
@Willard1951 @MarcEHJones @GillesnFio @AGW_is_bad @Devonian1342 @Rabs1958 @Anvndarnamn5 @jpgcrowley @mikeshearn49 @Anymous84861064 @ItsTheAtmospher @navigator087 @GAJAJW @BenKoby1911 @Jaisans @bulkbiker @Climatehope2 @DenisDaly @S_D_Mannix @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @priscian @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @BointonGiles @AristotleMrs @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @TheDisproof @MaggieL @Willy1000 @AuroriaTwittori @MartinJBern @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 3/7. Even in West Africa, crop yields have doubled since 1961 (104 ppmv ago).
Read 7 tweets
✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture
Apr 21
@ChrisBBacon3 @MarcEHJones @LottRan @Anymous84861064 @GillesnFio @Rabs1958 @S_D_Mannix @mikeshearn49 @ItsTheAtmospher @navigator087 @Veritatem2021 @Devonian1342 @GAJAJW @BenKoby1911 @Jaisans @bulkbiker @Climatehope2 @DenisDaly @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @priscian @SuperFoxyLoxy @JaapTitulaer @Willard1951 @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @BointonGiles @AristotleMrs @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @TheDisproof @MaggieL @Willy1000 @AuroriaTwittori @3GHtweets @MartinJBern @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 1/6. Skrable (2022) is 100% nonsense. Read some of the "comment on" responses to it, to understand why.

I have the paper, and the five responses, and Skrable's responses to the responses, on my site, here:
sealevel.info/Skrable2022/
2/6. The 14C bomb spike decay reflects 3 main processes:

1. Removal of CO2 from the air, into other "reservoirs" (ocean & terrestrial biosphere).

2. Exchanges of carbon between atmosphere & other reservoirs.

3. "Suess effect" dilution: the addition of fossil CO2 with no 14C.Image
3/6. The bomb spike decay follows a beautiful logarithmic decay curve, with an 11 year half-life, so an 11 / ln(2) = 16 year apparent lifetime. But that fails to take into account Suess effect dilution.
sealevel.info/logc14_two_hal…Image
Read 6 tweets
✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture
Apr 20
1/5. Anymous84861064 & Lynas (2021) are bludgeoning a strawman. They pretend  the climate debate is whether anthropogenic climate change is real, so they can claim there's a scientific consensus - while slyly avoiding saying what  the consensus is about.
sealevel.info/consensus_defi…Image
@Rabs1958 @LottRan @Anymous84861064 @GillesnFio @S_D_Mannix @mikeshearn49 @ItsTheAtmospher @navigator087 @Veritatem2021 @Devonian1342 @MarcEHJones @GAJAJW @BenKoby1911 @Jaisans @bulkbiker @Climatehope2 @DenisDaly @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @priscian @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @Willard1951 @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @BointonGiles @AristotleMrs @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @TheDisproof @MaggieL @Willy1000 @AuroriaTwittori @3GHtweets @MartinJBern @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 2/5. Most skeptics of climate alarmism agree with that "consensus" view, including me. So what? That's not what the debate is about!
quora.com/It-is-claimed-…
3/5. Of course AGW is "real." The climate industry's problem is that the best evidence shows that CO2 & manmade climate change are beneficial, not harmful. The "social cost of carbon" is negative.
sealevel.info/negative_socia…
Read 5 tweets
✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture
Apr 15
1/5. Stoichastich wrote, "He says quite clearly that the hothouse is warm because the glass absorbs dark rays from the ground (IR), which is clearly not why the hothouse is hot."

That's not what Arrhenius wrote. This is the paper:


This is the excerpt to which I think you must be referring:

"Fourier maintained that the atmosphere acts like the glass of a hot-house, because it lets through the light-rays of the Sun, but retains the dark-rays from the ground."

You've mistaken his meaning. In the first place, Arrhenius was summarizing what another scientist said. In the second place, the word "it" clearly refers back to "the atmosphere," not to the hot-house, as you've apparently supposed.

The main way that greenhouses retain heat is by preventing convective and evaporative cooling. That's why greenhouses made of plastic which is transparent to LW IR work just fine. (Glass greenhouses do get a small amount of additional warming effect by blocking outgoing LW IR.)iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
2/5. Stoichastich asked, "Where has anyone said that [Arrhenius] did use that term?"

You retweeted Dale Cloudman pointing out that "the greenhouse effect is a misnomer," in your tweet saying that Arrhenius' paper was "fundamentally flawed." So I thought that's what you meant.
3/5. Stoichastich asked, "Estimating it sounds interesting, but has it ever been measured?"

There've been some attempts both to calculate and to measure the "radiative forcing." I summarize them here:

sealevel.info/Radiative_Forc…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(