Maya Forstater Profile picture
Jan 21, 2020 18 tweets 11 min read Read on X
[Thread] My case raises Qs about freedom of speech & belief & how to reconcile women's rights & the rights of transgender people.

So how have the human rights organisations and other NGOs responded?

[Disclaimer: individual staff views do not necessarily represent orgs]
@IndexCensorship @jodieginsberg said back in Nov "I cannot see that MF has done anything wrong other than express an opinion that many feminists share – that there should be a public and open debate about the distinction between sex and gender.”

theguardian.com/law/2019/nov/1…
@TrevorPTweets chair of Index with a supportive message!
@fawcettsociety @Samsmethers has had nothing to say yet (we did have a cup of tea and a chat)
Incidentally 1,100 people would really, really like to Fawcett society step up and hold some grown up discussion about sex and gender ID
Amnesty International had this to say
Amnesty UK Trustee Senthorun Raj @senthorun endorsed
@cmclymer view that JK Rowling (and I) are transphobic for “stating that sex is real"...."a common transphobic assertion that has been dismissed by medical experts and other scientists."
@chiaracapraro head of Womens Rights @AmnestyUK said JKR should have known better
Also support Mermaids and Gendered Intelligence and something something TERFS
Other Amnesty senior staff and Trustees on twitter have been silent on this, and on their position on gender self ID
@libertyhq didn't have anything to say on my case but they go with the "transwomen are women, there is no issues for women's rights" position
Liberty Advocacy Director @CollierClare retweeted this blood libel by colleague @CoreyStoughton
Women's Resource Centre @whywomen - nothing. But Director @VivHayes did acknowledge what is going on
I don't know what she was hoping and raging about on December 19, but there was a lot of rage about that day.
@EachOtherUk didn't cover the case but CEO Sarah Wishart made her views known

Chair @AdamWagner1 did a radio interview
As @sjarnvig has pointed out the development sector and its influencers have had nothing to say

ditto Open Gov (with the honorable exception of @alanhudson1 )
When I was trying to keep my job @CGDev I wrote this in a letter to senior management. I thought that as a think tank we should be open to thinking about the issue.

In practice CGD was not.

But i did end up sparking a lot of conversations around a lot of tables over xmas
I know that while people can say "begone TERF" publicly, people in NGOs who are concerned about the issue are afraid to speak up.

And no mainstream org (or funder) has stepped up to host dialogue or analysis.

This issue will keep running. I hope they find their voice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

Apr 4
The CEO of @AdvanceHE has written to university vice chancellors acknowledging that "certain policy statements" cited in the @officestudents decision on @SussexUni "originated in part from" their template. Image
The parts in yellow came word-for-word from the Equality Challenge Unit/ Advance HE template....

i.e. almost all of it. Image
... this policy was influential and contributed to the culture of declaring everything "transphobia" and of hounding and not protecting those accused of it. Image
Read 13 tweets
Mar 26
The ONS have new guidance out on their gender identity data from the census....

They say that you can take it from them with "high confidence" that around 1 in 200 people have a "gender identity different from their sex at birth" 🤨 Image
But low confidence as to whether these are "trans men" "trans women" "non binary people" or others.

So what is it they are confident about? Image
They divide the apparent trans response into type A (e.g. sex male, says no to gender identity same question says "woman" for gender ID)

Type b 1 (says no to gender identity same question w no further answer)

Type b 12(says no to gender identity same question and then gives matching answer e.g. Male and man)Image
Read 9 tweets
Mar 23
So who is "Mr X" the trans identifying man held in high security male prison after multiple convictions for luring boys into sex acts while pretending to be a teenage girl on social media?
Could it be Nigel "Emma" Davies who posed as a teenager online and shared indecent images?

No. Davies wanted to engage with young girls. Davies was convicted but not jailed.

transcrimeuk.com/2024/05/16/emm…Image
Could it be former children’s holiday camp manager Cameron Osman who engaged more than 70 teenage boys in sexualised chat pretending to be a 16-year-old girl “Lizzie lemon”.



He is in prison. No idea what pronouns he now uses. independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…Image
Read 16 tweets
Mar 14
The core of the Melanie Hill v Metropolitan Police case is a Trans Day of Visibility event which took place on 31st March 2023, a week after British women's rights activist Kellie-Jay Keen was violently attacked in New Zealand while trying to speak.
spiked-online.com/2023/03/28/i-t…
In the run-up to the event, she was demonised in the Australian and New Zealand media, who portrayed her as a neo-Nazi. Attempts were made to have her visa revoked and to shut down her Let Women Speak tour.
In Melbourne, a group of far-Right men crashed the Let Women Speak event, clashing with socialist protestors and performing Nazi salutes.

Moira Deeming who attended tweeted her disappointment at the policing of the event

unherd.com/newsroom/the-t…Image
Read 24 tweets
Mar 13
What did the Met Police not want you to see in Melanie Newman's witness statement?

Out of 114 paragraphs they wanted to exclude 37 paragraphs, almost a third of her statement. Image
They said that the paras were of insufficient relevance.

They spent half a day arguing this (after a whole day trying to get one of their witnesses anonymised) .

The tribunal said no.
So what are these paragraphs about?

16/17 Training to "speak out" if we saw anything wrong including offensive and discriminatory messages.

But also "keep your head down". Image
Read 21 tweets
Mar 13
From Trans & Non-binary forum meeting in Dec 2022.

Met police told it should protect GenderGP & Mermaids from burn out.

Suggestion of promise by Community Engagement Officer that "anti-trans groups" will be investigated.

In June the following year they put me under investigation.Image
More in the same meeting about supporting Mermaids following the "binder incident" Image
Another forum meeting in 2023. This time they talk about Harry Miller and about the "Equalities Act"

Concerns are raised that people might be "arrested for being in the wrong toilet". Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(