1/
"Weinstein's lead defense attorney, Donna Rotunno, tried to raise doubts about [Sciorra's account] . . .
"I didn’t understand that was rape," Sciorra said about the encounter.
"You were 33 years old," Rotunno said." usatoday.com/story/entertai…
2/
First of all, DARVO alert. A: Attack the credibility of the victim.
I'm sure we will be seeing lots more DARVO coming from the defense. dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/defineDARV…
3/ And second, this is a dangerous mislead about the nature of chronological age and power and the dynamics of betrayal trauma. dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/defineBT.h…
4/
It is also stunning to me on a personal note. When I was 33 (29 years ago) and suddenly all over the news as a target of the FMSF, I was almost always introduced in media coverage as "the daughter, Jennifer."
5/
This baffled me as I was at the time a married mother of two children and a tenured professor of psychology and relatively empowered and privileged in the world. To go from being an accomplished adult to a child through media portrayal was stunning.
6/ Stunning and deeply sexist.
7/ "You were 33 years old," Rotunno said.
Now we see the flip side - we see women who were in vulnerable positions where there was a current great power asymmetry portrayed as if they had reasonable choices and power when in fact they did not.
8/
What do I conclude from this? That the forces of denial, the forces that protect an oppressive status quote -- that those forces will distort reality in any way -- no matter how inaccurate -- that is expedient for protecting the oppressive status quo.
9/
A woman who is 33 and has achieved social power (who speaks of abuse) is knocked back down as if a child. A woman who says that when she was 33 and dependent on a powerful abuse is knocked down by implying she had equal access to power and choice.
10 - and Last/
We can change this. We already are. We just have to keep up the courage and the solidarity. I especially hope we continue to cherish the courage of truth tellers and nurture institutional courage. jjfreyd.com/project-on-ins…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. It isn't an easy request to answer but I have been collecting examples.
Sometimes the acts of institutional courage are largely the result of a courageous institutional leader with the structural power to implement a courageous course.
3.
More often acts of institutional courage start with an individual with less power who draws together others and together the group uses activism and solidarity to educate and pressure institutional leaders to engage in acts of institutional courage.
1/ I was reading Science magazine, about NIH removing sex harassers from PI status for grants and came across a sentence that took my breath away:
"A larger number of NIH-funded scientists, 125, have been barred from serving as peer reviewers for grants. " sciencemag.org/news/2021/06/n…
2/ You might think since I research this stuff I would have thought of this intervention -but perhaps it was just too close to home. Early in my career a senior powerful man whose advances I had rejected as a grad student retaliated against me via peer review.
3/ He came to my presentations when I was an assistant prof and heckled me with aggressive questions from the audience. The same questions talk after talk. I learned to respond with calm assertiveness: my answer to you is the same as it was the last time you asked.
1/
I appreciate this clear message from the National Law Review to employers regarding implications to them arising from the Ninth Circuit's decision regarding my pay inequity case.
2/ "The decision is a reminder to employers. . . to analyze carefully any pay gaps that emerge along gender lines and that cannot be clearly explained by differences in the type of work performed. In this case, even . . ."
3/
"In this case, even the University’s own statistical analysis yielded no explanation for the significant pay disparity among full professors other than because of the retention bonuses that were a product of negotiation . . ."
1/ Just published Open Access: a new peer-reviewed research report about DARVO.
In this research @SarahHarsey and I report two primary findings about DARVO's influence.
I would say in our findings there is bad news and there is good news.
2/
First background: In 2017 we reported that higher levels of exposure to DARVO were associated with self-blame among victims. This suggests DARVO is effective for perpetrators, as self-blame is associated with self-silencing.
The 2017 research: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
3/ In the new research, we used experiments with vignettes.
In Study 1, each vignette described an incident of interpersonal violence between dating partners recounted as a first-person narrative from either the victim or perpetrator’s perspective. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
2/ As many of you know, I’ve worked for many years on institutional betrayal. In 2019, I started incubating a new center to repair and prevent institutional betrayal.
3/ At first, I really didn’t know how to create a new organization, but I felt such passion. Such a sense that the world needs this center.
1/ Even as the world is in chaos, science is here to steady us. I am grateful to @apdeprince and @DrJoanCook for this extraordinary article, using one of my original concepts, institutional betrayal, to explain this moment in time. Please read and RT. theconversation.com/theres-a-name-…
2/ Some brief context on the science. We begin with betrayal trauma theory. The gist: mistreatment by someone you depend upon puts you in a terrible bind. If you fully know about the mistreatment you may risk the relationship by withdrawing or confronting. So . .
3/ A way out of the bind for many is betrayal blindness – not fully knowing and preserving the relationship. This allows people to survive a terrible bind but comes with a cost down the road.
And thus. . .