FIRE Profile picture
Jan 24, 2020 4 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Hmm ... @babson told the @nytimes that Phansey was a staff member, not a professor. nyti.ms/2RQxe5M

Here's a screengrab of Babson's course catalogue for this semester from before he was fired:

thefire.org/babson-college…
@babson @nytimes Babson itself described Phansey as a faculty member — until it began scrubbing its website to delete mentions of his name. Unfortunately for them, Google’s cache kept copies of the pages it was deleting.
@babson @nytimes For example, here’s an April 19 profile on @Babson’s site, now memory-holed:

d28htnjz2elwuj.cloudfront.net/wp-content/upl…
@babson @nytimes To recap, Babson College has, so far, issued misleading public statements implying that there was an active law enforcement investigation and falsely claimed a faculty member was not a faculty member — all while refusing to stick by its public commitment to freedom of expression.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FIRE

FIRE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheFIREorg

Sep 4
ANTHONY COMSTOCK is one of America’s WORST free speech villains, thanks to his weaponization of America’s moral panic in the late 1800s to punish his ideological opponents with prison time and hard labor.

You might not know about Comstock’s reign of terror, but you should 🧵Image
2/ Comstock first lobbied to create the “Comstock Act,” nicknamed for its father and enforcer, in 1873. Created to stop the spread of vice, the Comstock Act allowed the moral crusader to silence freethinkers, “pornographers,” and pretty much anyone he disagreed with. Image
3/ The Comstock Act employed broad bans on “immoral,” “lewd,” or “indecent” writings circulating through the mail. You might think those words are vague enough to include just about anything. And you’d be right! Image
Read 14 tweets
Sep 3
LAWSUIT: With FIRE’s help, an Arizona mom is suing the City of Surprise, AZ., after the mayor ordered her arrest for questioning a pay raise for a city official.

In America, the last thing citizens should fear when they attend public meetings is leaving in handcuffs.
2/ When Surprise resident Rebekah Massie criticized the city attorney’s pay during a public comment period, she was interrupted, ejected, and arrested in front of her 10-year-old daughter.Image
3/ Surprise Mayor Skip Hall interrupted Rebekah, saying she broke a city rule prohibiting “charges or complaints against any employee of the City or members of the body.”

The mayor promised to have Rebekah ejected any time “you attack any staff member.”
Read 5 tweets
Aug 19
BREAKING: FIRE is suing to stop the SCOPE Act—a Texas law forcing websites to collect adults’ IDs or biometric data before they can access material “harmful to minors.”

Put another way, Texas is treating its adults like children.Image
2/ The SCOPE Act also restricts minors’ access to online content that Texas claims is “harmful material” because it “promotes, glorifies, or facilitates” behaviors such as suicide, drug abuse, bullying, harassment, or sexual exploitation.
3/ But that language is too vague and will lead to the censorship of constitutionally protected speech

When does arguing for marijuana legalization “promote” substance abuse? That’s a subjective judgment… and websites will play it safe by censoring ANY discussion of the topic.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 14
STATEMENT: Writing about the “boycott, divestment, and sanctions” (BDS) movement against Israel nearly a decade ago, FIRE's @glukianoff argued that academic boycotts of a nation’s institutions or scholars cannot be reconciled with academic freedom.

FIRE’s position has not changed, nor will it.Image
2/ As Hank Reichman, former chair of the American Association of University Professors’ Committee A once argued, “the whole idea of boycotting academic institutions in order to defend academic freedom is utterly wrongheaded.”
3/ Likewise, FIRE has long defended the rights of individual students and faculty to support or to criticize boycotts. That’s their right and a matter of conscience.

As Greg wrote in 2015: Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 13
WOODROW WILSON may be America’s WORST-EVER president on free speech.

As president, Wilson weaponized fear of spies during WWI to silence critics, arrest suffragists, and even weaponize the postal service. 🧵Image
2/ Although Wilson was hardly a stout defender of the First Amendment in his first term, it wasn’t until the USA entered WORLD WAR I in 1917 that his censorship program began.Image
3/ Wilson began with the Espionage Act banning false information “harmful” to the US war effort and restricting what could be sent through the mail. He effectively weaponized the postal service against his adversaries destroying the distribution channels for 70+ publications.Image
Read 13 tweets
Aug 8
“There’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech and especially around our democracy.”

Yes, there is. It’s called the First Amendment.

You might’ve heard the words “misinformation” and “disinformation” thrown around by political figures from the left, right, and center.

This viral clip from 2023 features Governor Tim Walz, the Democratic candidate for Vice President, talking about misinformation.

But sadly, calls to censor “misinformation” and “disinformation” are bipartisan these days.

But the answer isn’t censorship — it’s more speech.

In a liberal democracy, there’s only one solution to the problems of “misinformation” and “disinformation”: judging the truth for ourselves.

An informed citizenry that can separate fact from fiction without the heavy hand of government regulation is what separates democracy from dictatorship.

Because the alternative is to trust the government to decide the truth for us.

And FIRE data shows Americans don’t want that.

The third installment of FIRE’s National Speech Index found that roughly six out of ten Democrats, Republicans, and independents do not trust the government “at all” to decide what speech is hateful or false.

Each day, the American people face the all-important task of perpetuating self-government through reflection, debate, and choice.

Free speech is the most effective tool we have at our disposal to inform ourselves.

If the government obtains the power to suppress protected speech as “hateful” or “misinformation,” make no mistake: that power will be abused.

Nobody — not Democrats, not Republicans, and not independents — will be safe from censorship.

As we’ve said before, free speech makes free people.

The freer the speech, the freer the people.
Curious to see how America’s free speech sentiments shift over time?

Explore FIRE’s National Speech Index for new quarterly data, breaking down how and why 69% of Americans think we’re on the wrong track when it comes to free speech. thefire.org/news/survey-sh…
Still have questions about what is "misinformation" and how it differs from "disinformation"? FIRE’s @mharwood31 breaks down the important distinction.
thefire.org/research-learn…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(