FIRE Profile picture
Jan 24, 2020 4 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Hmm ... @babson told the @nytimes that Phansey was a staff member, not a professor. nyti.ms/2RQxe5M

Here's a screengrab of Babson's course catalogue for this semester from before he was fired:

thefire.org/babson-college…
@babson @nytimes Babson itself described Phansey as a faculty member — until it began scrubbing its website to delete mentions of his name. Unfortunately for them, Google’s cache kept copies of the pages it was deleting.
@babson @nytimes For example, here’s an April 19 profile on @Babson’s site, now memory-holed:

d28htnjz2elwuj.cloudfront.net/wp-content/upl…
@babson @nytimes To recap, Babson College has, so far, issued misleading public statements implying that there was an active law enforcement investigation and falsely claimed a faculty member was not a faculty member — all while refusing to stick by its public commitment to freedom of expression.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FIRE

FIRE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheFIREorg

Jul 1
BREAKING: Should the government have the power to dictate the opinions you see on social media?

If you said “hell no,” then we’ve got good news: The Supreme Court agrees.Image
2/ This morning, the Court rejected the idea that the government can force social media companies to host certain speech on their platforms, even if they don’t want to.

That’s a big win for free speech and a free internet.

supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
3/ Today’s opinion makes clear there’s no social media exception to the First Amendment.

The government can’t dictate what posts must be seen on X or Facebook any more than it can dictate what op-eds run in The New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.
Read 8 tweets
May 30
This morning, the Supreme Court unanimously reaffirmed a foundational First Amendment principle: “A government official cannot coerce a private party to punish or suppress disfavored speech on her behalf.”

The Court held the @NRA plausibly alleged New York state officials violated the First Amendment by coercing financial institutions to abandon the group to punish it for its advocacy.

The Court’s decision is a resounding win for the First Amendment.Image
2/ “The coercive tactics used by New York officials were a naked attempt to evade the Constitution,” said Robert Corn-Revere, FIRE’s chief counsel.“The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision sends a clear message that the government cannot use its bully pulpit to censor speech it doesn’t like without violating the First Amendment. Today’s decision is a major victory for free expression and the rule of law.”
3/ FIRE filed two friend-of-the-court briefs with the Supreme Court in support of the NRA’s First Amendment rights: Last April, we asked the Court to hear the case, and this January, we urged it to reach exactly today’s result.
thefire.org/cases/nra-v-vu…
Read 5 tweets
May 28
BREAKING: In a major win for free speech and academic freedom, @Harvard announced it will no longer make “official statements of empathy” about policy issues.Image
2/ As the full report from the faculty-led “Institutional Voice” working group says, “The purpose of the university is to pursue truth. In that pursuit, the university as an institution can never be neutral, because we believe in the value of seeking truth through open inquiry, debate, and weighing the evidence, as opposed to mere assertion or unjustified belief. . . .

The university and its leaders should not, however, issue official statements about public matters that do not directly affect the university’s core function.”Image
Image
Image
3/ FIRE strongly agrees. Last year, we endorsed institutional neutrality, which preserves colleges and universities’ ability to defend the rights of all students and faculty without apology or qualification.
Read 4 tweets
May 14
The University of Texas at San Antonio reportedly banned student protestors from:

• Using the words ‘Zionism’ and ‘Israel’;

• Chanting "From the river to the sea;"

• Speaking in Arabic.

It's unconstitutional censorship, plain and simple.

FIRE wrote @UTSA to demand that it reassure students that the First Amendment protects these words, phrases, and languages.

A public university should jump at the chance to show its commitment to the First Amendment, but UTSA ignored us.

So we wrote them again.Image
Image
2/ UTSA appeared on FIRE’s radar after reports indicated an administrator directed pro-Palestinian protestors to avoid using terms officials deemed “antisemitic hate speech,” apparently in an attempt to abide by Gov. Greg Abbott’s March 27 Executive Order.
3/ The gov’s EO directs Texas state universities to provide evidence they’re addressing anti-Semitism on campus. It specifically mentions certain phrases — like “From the river to the sea” — that the UTSA administrator later cited as examples of “antisemitic hate speech.”
Read 8 tweets
May 7
Dartmouth’s president will work with officials to drop all charges against two student journalists arrested last week while covering campus protests.

FIRE’s Student Press Freedom Initiative, the @SPLC, and more than a dozen press-rights organizations wrote a coalition letter to Dartmouth earlier this afternoon condemning the arrests.Image
2/ “[A]rresting journalists engaged in legitimate newsgathering sets a dangerous precedent, harms the public’s right to know, and defies Dartmouth’s commitments to students’ expressive and press rights,” FIRE’s coalition letter said.Image
Image
Image
3/ We’re grateful to the following organizations who joined FIRE and the SPLC in defending these student journalists’ rights:

College Media Association
Committee to Protect Journalists
Defending Rights & Dissent
Freedom of the Press Foundation
National Press Club
National Press Club Journalism Institute
National Press Photographers Association
PEN America
Radio Television Digital News Association
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
Society of Environmental Journalists
Society of Professional Journalists
Women Press Freedom
Read 4 tweets
Apr 19
🧵: A Berkeley bash turned into a constitutional clash when students attending a private dinner party transformed the event into a protest, sparking debate over the limits of First Amendment freedoms.

Luckily, FIRE knows something about the 1A 🔥
thefire.org/news/no-berkel…
2/ And so did the host. @UCBerkeleyLaw dean Erwin Chemerinsky is a staunch free speech advocate and renowned 1A scholar.
3/ Like any principled free speech advocate, Chemerinsky defended his critics’ 1A rights to express their views—even when students attacked him on campus with posters he described as “blatant anti-Semitism.”
Image
Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(