1/ JAMA: "High nonresponse & dropout rates suggest mismatch between complex clinical reality of military-related PTSD and one size-fits-all treatment approaches in VA"
"...do not effectively manage PTSD in large % of patients" #cbtworks#somepsych#psysci jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
2/ Talking point emailed from VA central office: "Disseminating [same one-size treatments] through national training initiatives is appropriate given that these treatments have the most robust evidence of effectiveness."
Someone invested in "alternative facts."
JAMA or VA?
3/ Therapies in question were NEVER tested against relationship-based talk therapy as practiced by most psychotherapists.
How can a treatment have "most robust evidence" when never compared to psychotherapy as practiced in real world by most psychotherapists?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ We are the “authors” of all our thoughts & actions. We claim ownership of some of our thoughts and actions and disclaim ownership of others
When we claim ownership, we tend to use the word “I.” I did this. I said that
When we disclaim ownership, we tend to use the word “it”
2/ For example: I didn't mean it. The devil made me do it. It wasn’t me, it was the the alcohol. It wasn't me, that's not who I am. It just happened
Freud observed this & used exactly these words, “I” & “it,” to describe thoughts & actions that we claim & disclaim, respectively:
3/ “Das Is und Das Es.” I and it
The words were unfortunately mistranslated as ego & id, by a translator who thought he needed to make it sound more science-y. Unfortunate, because the original words were experience-near & intuitive to anyone. The simple starting observation of
They’re discussing psychoanalytic object relations. Mental representations of self & other are are formed through relational experiences & internalized as part of our inner world. The representations become templates/schemas for subsequent relationships & the patterns get relived
/2 Psychotherapy is also a relationship and in one way or another, these relational templates are recreated in the therapy relationship too. The dividing line between meaningful psychotherapy vs. 'something else' is that in meaningful therapy, the relational patterns will be
3/ recognized over time, discussed over time, explored, understood, and ideally, reworked. Thus the therapy relationship becomes, simultaneously, a vehicle for self-understanding and insight, and a template for a new and different kind of relationship with other people
1/ “These three roles [the abuser, the victim & the omnipotent rescuer] can appear in any particular order or sequence. A common sequence is for the therapist to start out in the role of rescuer (a role to which therapists are naturally inclined), while the patient begins in the
2/ role of victim. The therapist may become involved in an effort to be the perfect parent who will repair all the damage done by the real parent. This role is doomed to failure because the therapist is not a parent and will never be able to fulfill all of the patient's [needs]
3/ The therapist who tries to be an all-good parent starts running the extra mile by extending hours, not collecting the fee, taking repeated late-night calls and hugging the patient. Demands by the patient may escalate until the therapist begins to feel tormented, as though
1/ The “evidence-based therapy” game—explained with 🥞
I have a pancake recipe. I do randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing that people like my 🥞 better than getting no breakfast at all
My🥞are now “evidence-based” & yours aren’t. I start telling everyone my🥞are superior
2/ I do more RCTs and compare my🥞to a fake🥞recipe. No one makes🥞with this fake recipe, I just made it up to be my “control group”—and left out key ingredients
I now have RCTs with an “active comparator” condition. My🥞 are empirically proven. They’re “the gold standard”
/3 I tell everyone my🥞are proven and your🥞 are scientifically discredited. No one should ever eat them
This seems a little unfair to you, so you start doing RCTs too—to study your🥞using the same research methods
Guess what? It turns out people like your🥞just as much as my🥞
1/ “The term ‘support’ has positive connotations to many therapists. It implies they are being helpful & help is what therapists intend to offer. It is consequently easy for therapists to overlook the very real limitations of supportive, helping interventions. For example, rather
2/ than solving a problem for a patient, the therapist can work to build the patient’s capacity to solve problems autonomously. In other words, there is another route available to therapists. Supportive interventions can be enormously useful at a given time for certain patients,
3/ when applied in a conscious, planned manner, with understanding and skill. However, very often supportive interventions are entered into almost reflexively and without much thought. Supportive interventions applied in this fashion often represent [dysfunctional relationship