My Authors
Read all threads
This is an interesting tweet about the alleged police “warning” given to @Glinner by West Yorkshire Police.

1) there is no such thing as a Police “warning”. You are either charged (then convicted or acquitted) or cautioned (which equates to a guilty plea).
2) what police do where there are “allegations of unproven harassment” is issue a “Police Information Notice” which is an administrative record that (a) “warms” you an allegation has been made and (b) the accused has been informed of this allegation.
The fact that some forces call these PINs “harassment warnings” is a term of art, so many forces don’t. And like the logging of “hate non-crime incidents”, deeply controversial because you cannot appeal them. In fact the police themselves recently said the use of them should end.
3) the third purpose of the PIN is to intervene early to prevent the situation escalating. But each PIN must inform the accused the PIN is for information only, no finding of guilt has been made and the allegation remains unproven. Here is a useful explainer from a solicitor.
4) finally, and to show that Stephanie Hayden is apparently not being honest in the above tweet, in this case the police force which issues @glinner with the “warning” has a policy of only giving then in person and not “over the phone”. westyorkshire.police.uk/sites/default/…
Therefore as @glinner only received the “warning” via a telephone call, this doesn’t actually amount to a warning at all according to the West York’s Police own policy, which clearly states the “warning” cannot be given over the phone.
What this amounts to is a policeman calling Graham and saying Hayden has alleged harassment which is unproven and we are informing you of the allegation. Nothing more.

People should stop dining out on this. PINs are misused by cry-bullies as a cosh to score cheap points.
They are then reported by gullible and lazy journalists, such as the @guardian who cause unfair reputation damage by publishing misleading and inaccurate reportage.

The facts are; Hayden reported Graham for harassment and they called him and informed him of this.

That’s it.
Oh, and as for the rest of the tweet, solicitors inviting claimants to discontinue because the claim has no merit is normal, especially when the claimant is skint and running-up costs the defendant won’t ever get back. Key point is no damages were paid to Hayden, who had no case.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Adrian Yalland

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!