Anyone who opposes or disagrees with ruling dispensation is marked anti national.
Amidst this, anti CAA protests is heartening.
Unfortunately initial approach of SC towards this was a conservative one.
Justice Shah : There was no doubt that the judgment should have been implemented.
'In review petitions, a "curious" order was passed, where a larger bench was to consider all those issues while the actual cases were to be kept pending'
Must be the first time that something of this nature happened in review.
"The other matters (relating to Muslim women entry in mosque, FGM, Parsi women rights etc) were not even before the court when they referred"
"The court even refused to grant relief to the two women who sought implementation of the judgment, but SC said they did not want an explosive situation"
"He says its unusual that the name of the judge who wrote the judgment was missing.
The addednum was also anonymous".
"Though SC was not satisfied that allahabad HC decision was not feasible regarding peace and tranquility, whether SC did justice is questionable"
"When it went to mediation, suggestion was give up claim to land and in return Hindu parties will assure that they will not rake up other related religious issues.
I was told that Hindus would not give any such assurance"
"It's been 6 months.
In all cases, the court has failed to give a satisfactory response"