I'm listening in on the "Protecting Women's Access to Reproductive Health Care" hearing, a federal legislative hearing that will hear testimony on the "Women's Health Protection Act of 2019" a federal bill that would protect access to abortion.
Right now we're in opening statements, hearing from @michaelcburgess from Texas, a former OBGYN, who identifies himself as "pro-life"
He calls the bill's language "heavy handed" and notes that medical advances have put into question Roe v Wade's viability benchmarks.
@michaelcburgess He closes by calling the bill "most uncomfortable and threatening legislation" he's seen in his career as a lawmaker.
@michaelcburgess Now we're on to @FrankPallone, who points out that anti-abortion restrictions fall the hardest on the most vulnerable patients, particularly those who are low-income.
"Our country needs hope. America needs hope and healing, and abortion doesn't bring hope or healing."
@michaelcburgess@FrankPallone@repgregwalden@cathymcmorris First witness is from Yashica Robinson, MD, who's the medical director and the Alabama Women’s Center for Reproductive Alternatives, one of the state's few abortion providers.
Alabama also passed a near-total ban on abortion last year, though not currently in effect.
Because Alabama has so few abortion providers, Robinson says that patients seeking the procedure in the state sometimes drive up to eight hours to her clinic.
We're now hearing from Georgette Forney (@GeorgetteForney) President of Anglicans for Life, Co-founder of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign.
She begins her testimony by sharing she had an abortion as a teenager and has rejected the decision since.
@GeorgetteForney Now we're hearing from Teresa Stanton Collett, a professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law, where she serves as director of the school's "Prolife Center."
@GeorgetteForney Now we're hearing from Nancy Northup, the president and chief executive officer of the Center for Reproductive Rights (@ReproRights). Her firm is the one arguing against the Louisiana admitting privilege law that will be in front of the Supreme Court next month.
@GeorgetteForney@ReproRights Now we're hearing from Holly Alvarado, an abortion-rights advocate who says she faced multiple barriers when accessing abortion. She's in D.C. to share that story.
@GeorgetteForney@ReproRights Alvarado was preparing for deployment to Afghanistan when she found out she was pregnant.
Her only option was to make a six-hour round trip to a different state to get the procedure.
@GeorgetteForney@ReproRights Now we're going into member questions. But here's something interesting - chairwoman @RepAnnaEshoo
starts by clarifying that there *are* safety standards in the bill, something that witnesses said there were not.
@RepEliotEngel .@GKButterfield says he's "struck" that SCOTUS is taking up a case that he believes is "settled law."
Next month the Supreme Court will hear June Medical Services v. Gee, a case that many say is nearly identical to a Texas law that was struck down by SCOTUS
@RepEliotEngel@GKButterfield@RepMGriffith "I can tell you I've never met a woman who said the state-mandated counseling she received from me changed her mind," Robinson, one of Alabama's few abortion providers, says.
The period data is held by the company Aktivate, which isn't a medical company and therefore isn't protected by HIPAA laws. i.e. the data could be turned over if subpoenaed.
The idea is that all student athletes have to fill out medical forms to play, in the event of injury. And for some, that includes period info.
But, in a state like Florida where politicians are policing health care, that practice takes on all new risks for student athletes.
It was yet another heavy news week for post-Roe abortion news.
The 1-year anniversary of #SB8, a new lawsuit in Indiana, a package of bills in California to protect abortion, more confusion in Michigan, & movement in South Carolina's near-total abortion ban.
Let's dig in.
🧵
All eyes should be on South Carolina right now where lawmakers are racing to push through a near-total ban on abortion.
On Tuesday, the SC House advanced HB 5399. It's a near-total ban.
Exceptions:
- To prevent death, "substantial risk of death" or "substantial physical impairment of a major bodily function"
- Rape & incest, but only in the 1st 12 weeks
The South Carolina house just voted 47-55, failing to pass house bill 5399 which would have banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy w/o exceptions for rape and incest.
power 👏 of 👏 Kansas 👏👏👏
To clarify! There are a handful of very restrictive abortion bans flying around South Carolina’s state house right now, but this was the worst of the worst.