So "costs" in one category might be offset by "gains" in another.
We (almost) all accept this point as obvious when we're talking about work-life balance (family, friends, mental health, hobbies).
So, for example: this year I'm lucky to have lots of time (got a fellowship = no teaching requirements!).
On the other hand, sometimes my motivation has suffered because my discipline / my institution / my department are, erm, ... Not Always Forces for Good?
One reason for that is -well, if you've made it this far you've surely heard my rant (at least once) before!
Recently I spent quite a bit of time helping to organize this event. Wasn't a huge timesuck but it involved the kind of admin tasks that break up your day and always end up taking long than you think.
On the other hand though... seeing Terry Karl back in the Harvard Government department for the first time in three-and-a-half decades, speaking out and *being heard*??
I literally watch that clip and BOOM a promising new research question pops into my head.
I... understand Bayesian statistics now?
I'm 👏 making 👏 ggplots 👏 without 👏 googling 👏
OK obviously that's an exaggeration.
But I do feel less shitty about my discipline / my institution / my department right now. And trying to become a political scientist feels more like a worthy goal.
So, professors: if your grad students are making choices that seem straightforwardly suboptimal to you?...
Take a step back. Before giving advice (esp if unsolicited), ask yourself: what can I learn from this?
And grad students: don't let others scare you into thinking that you're wasting time or falling behind if you want to make your community a better place.
(And, of course, don't let anyone trick you into thinking you are obligated to fix the systems that never worked for you.)
In April 2022, Russian hackers leaked a cache of 22,000 emails from a network of encrypted Protonmail accounts, including ex-MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove.
The emails were uploaded to a site with the domain name "sneakystrawhead" – apparently a reference to Boris Johnson's typically unkempt hairstyle...
A group of hard-right Brexiteers, including a former head of MI6, secretly attacked a top science journal after their debunked paper on an "alternative" Covid vaccine was rejected.
From @ComputerWeekly & @BylineTimes, this is a MUST READ 👇
This piece raises serious questions about the conduct of Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6 who is best known for his role in the intelligence failures surrounding the Iraq war.
In the early stages of the pandemic, Dearlove began collaborating with a group of scientists who claimed to have proof that the Covid pandemic was the result of a lab leak.
Mansfield's in-depth ethnographic work has given him an unmatched insight into the inner lives of Women. #Mansfieldat90
While feminist scholars pointed to spousal inequalities in domestic work, Mansfield's meticulous research allowed him to uncover previously unacknowledged contributions of men to the running of a household.
In 2021, Harvard apologized to Terry Karl and many others who were sexually harassed by Jorge Domínguez, acknowledging "institutional failures".
At the same time, Harvard was doing the exact same thing to the complainants in the Comaroff case!
And that's not the only overlap...
Jorge Domínguez had been director of the @HarvardWCFIA from 1996 - 2006, a position that allowed him to exert considerable power over funding opportunities.
John Comaroff is affiliated with the Weatherhead Center, as are (by my count) 22 of the 38 signatories to the open letter.
Of course, it's not exactly surprising that many social science faculty are affiliated with one of the main centers for social science research.
But several of the signatories hold (or held) leadership positions, not just affiliations.
Adding new links to the map each week is depressing, but one silver lining is seeing a coalition of journalists, lawyers, academics, and citizens come together to expose this government's corruption.
"I thought, I need a side project that's going to keep me occupied, something useful, that's nothing to do with Trump."
Q: Why does cronyism matter?
A: The idea that we created a ‘VIP lane’ for politically-connected firms goes against every set of anti-corruption best practices that's ever been written. By creating that system, the government incentivised all kinds of opportunistic behaviour.