justdad7 Profile picture
Feb 14, 2020 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🇨🇦 Some comments on the state of free speech in Canada in light of the @WeAreFairCop and #IStandWithScottow cases. In Canada it is unlikely that anyone would be criminally charged for 'misgendering'. The hate crime provisions in the Criminal Code are very restrictive it would /2
require much more than using the wrong pronouns to justify a charge. Section 319(1) applies to statements made in public which are likely to provoke a breach of the peace. Section 319(2) is broader and could cover statements made on social media but charges under this section /3
require the approval of the attorney general. Charges are very rare. The police would not be able to make an arrest on a complaint of a private individual. The limitations on free speech in Canada generally fall into three categories: 1. Non-publication orders made in criminal /4
or family cases involving minors which can be enforced by contempt of court charges; 2. Civil or administrative action under provincial human rights codes (Morgane Oger is big on this); 3. Non-governmental action by workplace, professional or academic sanctions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with justdad7

justdad7 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @justdad7

Jun 25
1/ This has not been a good year for the World Professional Association for Transgender Health @WPATH. It began with the news that its membership had plummeted by 60% over a year.
criticaltherapyantidote.org/2024/01/17/bre…
@wpath 2/ In March, the WPATH Files by Mia Hughes (@_CryMiaRiver) exposed internal discussions which showed WPATH members' disregard for science and medical ethics.
@wpath @_CryMiaRiver 3/ In April, the Cass Review concluded that the WPATH SOC8 was not reliable clinical guideline and could not recommend using it in the UK.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 12
1/ A recent critique of the Cass Review exposes the real agenda of the activist clinicians supporting gender affirming care. They don't care about evidence based medicine because their case for GAC has nothing to do with promoting good health.
2/ This is made clear in this paragraph which argues that "evaluating the efficacy of GAC based on psycho social well-being is misguided." In the authors view, looking for mental health benefits from GAC involves pathologizing "transness."
Image
Image
3/ The article draws heavily on an argument by Florence Ashley, who is a co-author, that GAC should be treated in the same way as reproductive health. These arguments were refuted in a recent article by @GorinMoti onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ha…
Read 8 tweets
May 13
1/ This excellent New York Times interview with Hilary Cass ends with a statement from the president of the @AmerAcadPeds about their so-called systematic review which shows that he does not understand evidence-based medicine.
nytimes.com/2024/05/13/hea…
@AmerAcadPeds 2/ AAP president Dr. Benjamin Hoffman said that the group had considered the Cass Review and "added it to the evidence base undergoing a systematic review." This is not how systematic reviews work. Image
@AmerAcadPeds 3/ Systematic reviews consider primary research rather than government policy documents like the Cass Review. More importantly, the decision as to what is included in a systematic review is determined by pre-registered search criteria.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 28
1/ I suppose it's good that the @globeandmail have featured this article by @RobynUrback on the front page but the kids the medical system is labelling as trans and sterilizing deserve better still.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…
@globeandmail @RobynUrback 2/ The article starts with a discussion of the Dutch approach to affirmative care but fails to note just how weak their research was. The whole model of care is based on a study of 55 subjects with a 1 year follow up period, and no control group.
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
@globeandmail @RobynUrback 3/ The article discusses the increase in referrals to clinics and the fact that 79% of patients are now "born female" but does not give a good idea of the magnitude and potential significance of this change. Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 23
1/ It is two weeks since the Cass Review was published the The @globeandmail, which describes itself as Canada's national news organization has not printed a word about it. Why the silence? Image
@globeandmail 2/ The @globeandmail cannot claim that the Cass Review is not newsworthy. Its main competitor, the @Nationalpost has written on it extensively as has every other major newspaper in the English speaking world. Image
@globeandmail @nationalpost 3/ Coverage of the Cass Review has not been confined to the conservative press. Liberal leaning outlets like the Guardian, the Washington Post, the New York Times and even The Toronto Star have given it balanced coverage.
thestar.com/opinion/star-c…
Read 7 tweets
Apr 18
1/ Another falsehood in the awful CBC coverage of the Cass Report which needs to be refuted in detail is the claim the puberty blockers are reversible.
cbc.ca/news/health/pu…
Image
2/ This issue did not receive a lot of attention in the Cass report because NHS England updated its website to remove a claim that puberty blockers are fully reversible back in 2020. However, the claim still persists in Canada in the face of the evidence.
transgendertrend.com/nhs-no-longer-…
3/ The CBC story refers to the Canadian Paediatric Society position statement which in turn cites WPATH SOC8. This is what WPATH says. None of the references in the paragraph are to research that supports the claim that puberty blockers are reversible. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
In general, the goal of GnRHa administration in TGD adolescents is to prevent further development of the endogenous secondary sex characteristics corresponding to the sex designated at birth. Since this treatment is fully reversible, it is regarded as an extended time for adolescents to explore their gender identity by means of an early social transition (Ashley, Citation2019e). Treatment with GnRHas also has therapeutic benefit since it often results in a vast reduction in the level of distress stemming from physical changes that occur when endogenous puberty begins (Rosenthal, Citation201...
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(