In case it's unclear what's really going on here:
Trump's team wants to sue *somebody* for (accurately) saying he colluded.
They searched The New York Times for something they *might* be able to contest in court with hair-splitting arguments about insinuations and word choice.
Trump's team wants to sue *somebody* for (accurately) saying he colluded.
They searched The New York Times for something they *might* be able to contest in court with hair-splitting arguments about insinuations and word choice.
*And* the claim that the article was knowingly false (image 1) relies on a report that came out *after* the op-ed in question—and blatantly mischaracterizes Mueller's actual conclusions about whether there was a Trump-Russia conspiracy (images 2 and 3). justice.gov/storage/report… 
There's a reason for this lawsuit.
It's not happening because the op-ed was wrong about collusion.
It's because Trump is desperate to cast himself—and Russia—as victims of a witch hunt rather than perpetrators of an attack on American democracy.
themoscowproject.org/dispatch/trump…
It's not happening because the op-ed was wrong about collusion.
It's because Trump is desperate to cast himself—and Russia—as victims of a witch hunt rather than perpetrators of an attack on American democracy.
themoscowproject.org/dispatch/trump…
