Kevin Ring Profile picture
Mar 3, 2020 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
A victory for compassion. Proving again that compassionate release is not just for the wealthy and well-connected, Larry Karr is now home. Karr was sentenced in 2018 for conspiracy to distribute oxycodone. He now has stage IV lung cancer.
The Clearinghouse for Compassionate Release, which @MaryfromFAMM helped to establish and manage, was able to find Mr. Karr excellent pro bono counsel at #Zuckerman, who filed a motion for his release. The government filed a nasty and illogical opposition to the motion...
...arguing among other things that while Mr. Karr is terminal, his motion should be denied because no one knows precisely when he is going to die (while acknowledging he had been given less than 12 months to live).
They also argued that because he can eat and move short distances, he does not qualify as terminal. The judge, a Trump appointee in Kentucky, roundly rejected the government’s arguments...
...and held that “the compassionate release statute does not require that the Court hear the death rattle before acting.” Mr. Karr's family is grateful to have him home for his remaining days. We're happy for them. And society is no less safe.
The compassion in compassionate release is not just for the incarcerated individual, but for his or her innocent family members who want closure at the end of life. We need more of this and states should look at the new federal model created in the First Step Act.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Ring

Kevin Ring Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KevinARing

Nov 4, 2023
THREAD: Do you remember the #KeepThemHome campaign? 2 years ago, thousands of ppl sent to federal home confinement during the pandemic were faced with prospect of being returned to prison, despite fact that they were thriving at home and were never told they might have to go back
If you don’t know or remember, you can get the background here:
In Dec 2021, sanity prevailed, and the Biden DOJ issued a new OLC memo that said the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has authority under the CARES Act to determine whether to return anyone to prison. That should have been the end of the story.
reuters.com/world/us/us-ju…
Read 16 tweets
Nov 7, 2022
First chapter in this interesting new book is about criminal punishment. Some highlights:
"Studies show that without a threshold level of certainty, punishment will simply not deter. Criminologists have found that crime increases in places that have lower than a 30 percent arrest rate, and it decreases in places with arrest rates higher than 30 percent...
"If the certainty of being caught matters, law enforcement becomes essential for deterrence."
Read 5 tweets
Feb 18, 2022
When the GOP takes over the House (and maybe the Senate) in November, and the talk of how much this development will hurt justice reform efforts, remember this moment. Pending in Congress is a bill - the EQUAL Act - that would reduce unnecessary prison sentences by 67,00 years.
The bill was approved by the House with 361 votes. If brought to the floor of the Senate tomorrow, it surely would receive more than 60 votes. It is the only decarceration measure that has broad support from law enforcement organizations, like @ndaajustice,
conservative advocates, like @RightOnCrime, and usual justice reform allies. It would allow @POTUS to correct his support for the 1986 law that created the crack disparity. Most importantly, it would reunite thousands of families without increasing crime.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18, 2022
Buckle up for a longer #KeepThemHome update:
In AG Garland’s announcement that DOJ would not require people on CARES Act home confinement to return en masse at the end of the pandemic, he said DOJ would begin a rule-making process.
The process is to determine who BOP should bring back to prison. FAMM and others have been arguing no one should be sent back unless they broke the rules. BOP in a memo repeated its view people with lengthy sentences remaining should be brought back to prison for programming.
In fact, BOP said sentence length should be an important factor in deciding whom to bring back.
We sent a letter to Dep AG Lisa Monaco recently explaining why that reasoning is flawed. We gave real-life examples and the first was Kendrick Fulton. We wrote:
Read 18 tweets
Jan 31, 2022
#KeepThemHome update: Some folks are getting scared that a recent BOP memo means that certain people on CARES Act home confinement are going to have to go back to prison when the pandemic ends. While that has always been a possibility, I want to share why it's not time to panic.
The original OLC memo was in response to a BOP request for clarification that BOP could bring some people on CARES Act HC back to prison if they thought they would benefit from additional programming, etc. OLC shocked the world in Jan '21 by saying you have to bring everyone back
When OLC revised its memo last month, it said BOP didn't have to bring everyone back - hooray - but that BOP's original interpretation was accurate and that BOP COULD choose to bring some people back. Now a memo from BOP's departing general counsel outlining how they might do...
Read 8 tweets
Jul 25, 2021
The New York Times story last week has generated a lot of buzz about the home confinement issue. For newcomers, here is a get-you-up-to-speed thread. nytimes.com/2021/07/19/us/…
In March 2020, Congress passed the CARES Act to expand BOP’s discretion to give home confinement in order to combat the spread of Covid. This was smart. Typically, BOP is only authorized to send ppl to home confinement for a bit of their sentence – 6 mos or 10%, whichever is less
The CARES Act authorized DOJ to give more time on home confinement so long as the AG found that COVID was “materially affecting” BOP’s functioning. Barr did that right away and DOJ established strict eligibility criteria – to get extended home confinement, a person:
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(