B Graham Disciple Profile picture
Mar 13, 2020 7 tweets 1 min read Read on X
1/ My quick take on short selling ban news. Regulators around the world have extensive powers to ban or limit short selling. Korea just banned all short selling for 6 months, and short selling of certain stocks was banned in certain parts of Europe.
2/ During the financial crisis, the SEC banned short selling of certain “financial stocks.” Fun fact: In 2008, many (who were in denial about causes of the crisis) blamed short sellers for loss of confidence in banks.
3/ My base case is that the SEC probably won’t do this again in the absence of more days like yesterday, and if they did so, it would likely be targeted to a subset of the market.
4/ The SEC ban in 2008 after Lehman failed did little to help market confidence and probably hurt it. And this time around, short sellers aren’t the primary scapegoat.
5/ On the other side of the ledger, the WH cares more about stock prices than any other in history, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they tried to pressure the SEC to do so if the market turns south again.
6/ Utilmately, the decision would be in the hands of the SEC commissioners. If the Chair (Clayton) want to do it, and can get 2 other commissioners to vote for it, it would happen. If the Chair doesn’t want it happen or can’t get support from 2 commisioners, it won’t happen.
7/ The SEC’s powers are virtually unlimited here. Congress gave the SEC power to play god on a short term basis if the SEC finds that there is a market emergency.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with B Graham Disciple

B Graham Disciple Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bgrahamdisciple

Dec 21, 2022
I hadn’t paid much attention to Elon’s margin loan for a long time because he was so far from a margin call, but someone nudged me to take a look. Here is a quick analysis. Musk could be pretty close to a margin call.
Notes: March 31, 2022 numbers are from the most recent proxy. I adjusted share quantity for stock split. Max loan value is based on Tesla’s 25% max LTV policy for officers.
To consider possible number of shares pledged currently, I simply divided the value pledged a/o March 31 by yesterday’s closing price. Obviously, Musk can pledge more shares than he owns, so this number is too high, but demonstrates the problem Elon faces.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 23, 2020
1/ Elon Musk is openly defying his SEC fraud settlement and violating a federal court order. @SECEnfDirectors @SEC_Enforcement, are SEC settlements optional now? Elon Musk is required to get tweets about $TSLA financial condition pre-approved by an experienced securities lawyer.
2/ Yesterday, Elon Musk updated Tesla revenue projections by responding to a tweet within 3 minutes or less. There is no possible way his tweet could have been reviewed in 3 minutes or less. I attach the relevant portion of Musk’s SEC fraud settlement for handy reference.
3/ PS. Elon Musk has blocked me and many others, so I don’t get these tweets in a timely manner. How is that compliant with Regulation FD? Thanks in advance for looking into this SEC.
Read 5 tweets
May 10, 2020
1/ Putting myself in Alameda official shoes, I think they absolutely must establish their authority over the Tesla reopen. They can do so via compromise including one that allows Musk to save some face, but they simply cannot afford to let Musk just call the shots.
2/ There are still a lot of innings left in C19 restrictions and they can’t permit Musk and Tesla to defy their authority. That would destroy their authority in general over others, and over Tesla in the future.
3/ For example, what if there is an outbreak at the factory after reopen and the county needs to require measures to address? Or what if there is a rebound/second waive and they decide to order full shelter in place again?
Read 5 tweets
May 2, 2020
1/ Here are key reasons why I think the short risk/reward is great RN:
A. Musk burned many baggies on Friday. Some percentage will never come back.
B. Musk torched brand with C19 tantrums. Many supporters of lockdowns (esp. wealthy liberals are key customers).
2/ C. Very good chance Musk meltdown was triggered by horrifying condition of business and/or other terrible news.
D. C19 has devastated auto business, and global economy. Expensive cars will be particularly hard hit. Stretch M3 buyers will be mostly gone for a long time.
3/ E. Badly needed cap raise just got much more difficult.
F. Musk could be perceived as in real jeapordy with the SEC for a while. While the SEC could ultimately decide it is up to board and shareholders to decide if they want a moron CEO, the SEC will likely investigate.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 29, 2020
1/ Here’s a lesson in financial incentives and sociopathic billionaires.
Elon Musk pledged about half of his shares as of 12/31 when the stock closed at $418.
On March 16, Alameda issued shelter in place order clearly requiring to close its Fremont factory.
2/ By March 18, we learned that Musk was defying the order and keeping the factory open. Why? Because the stock had dropped into the $350s, and it was dropping fast. To maintain the value of his share pledge, Musk would have had to pledge over 60% of his shares in the $350s.
3/ Given the choice between maintaining his empire and lifestyle versus protecting the health and safety of his employees, their families and the local community, Musk chose the former.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 26, 2020
1/ My take on $TSLA Fremont factory situation, having followed it pretty closely: I think it is likely that the Bay Area lockdown order is going to be extended beyond May 3, but modified to permit auto manufacturing with safeguards to protect employees.
2/ That is the most sensible way to reconcile statements from officials indicating the lockdown order will likely be extended and Tesla’s behavior, which indicates confidence $TSLA Fremont will be allowed to reopen May 4.
3/ Modification to allow car manufacturing would simply bring the order in line with the CA order and the orders of many states. It is fair to assume there has been a lot of behind the scenes lobbying and conversations and Musk would have a good sense of the situation.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(