Murali Krishnan Profile picture
Mar 18, 2020 25 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Madhya Pradesh floor test: Dushyant Dave making arguments in Supreme Court for Congress on horse trading.

"It is not a question of simple floor test. It is a question of destroying democracy using muscle and money power", submits Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshFloorTest: We are facing a crisis today which humanity has nor faced for a century and BJP being a responsible party is doing this, says Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshFloorTest: Tomorrow they will go to Rajasthan, hijack 20 MLAs and ask for floor test. Is this the kind of democracy we envisaged, ask Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis:
The BJP is going doing this at a time when humanity is facing a crisis (coronavirus). Is this how a responsible party acts, asks Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshFloorTest: Governor does not represent BJP. He is expected to be independent, Dave on the responsibility that comes with the office of Governor.
#MadhyaPradeshFloorTest: Governor is not heeding the Chief Minister when the CM tells him that MLAs have been kept in captive outside Madhya Pradesh. It is a mockery of justice, submits Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: The captive MLAs kept in rooms, expenses for a day will come to Rs. 30k to 40k per day, says Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Dave referring to Constitutional morality.

"When I used Constitutional morality many spoke as if it is new. But it is not Constitutional morality of judges that I spoke about but constitutional morality envisaged in the Constitution", says Chandrachud J.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Dave placing reliance on Constituent Assembly Debates to make his case that act of BJP goes against Constitutional morality.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Democracy in India is only a top dressing of Indian soil which is essentially undemocratic, Dave quoting Dr. BR Ambedkar.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis:
"I beseech my friends on other side to advise their clients to stop this" Dave urges quoting Dr. Ambedkar's words on possibilties of India losing democracy and freedom due to people placing greed above nation.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: By independence, we have lost the excuse to blame British for anything going wrong. If anything goes wrong now, we will only have ourselves to blame, Dave quotes Dr Ambedkar.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: A stable governance should be the basic feature of constitution. Nobody should be allowed to indulge in acts which affects such stability, Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: "We had a manifesto. We were elected by people based on that manifesto", says Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Has the speaker applied his mind to all 22 resignations, asks Justice DY Chandrachud.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Sr. Counsel Singhvi says Governor communicated his subjective satisfaction to accept the resignation and therefore speaker accepted their resignation.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: SG Tushar Mehta says the Chief Minister had conveyed to Governor to accept resignation of those 6 who were ministers.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: No role assigned to Governor to decide on resignations. Governor has no role in disqualification proceedings under tenth schedule. Any such order by Governor constitutionally unsustainable, submits Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Dave submits that when an MLA resigns, then there should be by election to that seat before a trust vote can happen.

Heavens will not fall if Congress govt is allowed to continue for 2 more months, says Dave.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: Mukul Rohatgi begins counter.

Rohatgi says petitioner in Dave's case is a party which was responsible for mass murder of democracy in 1975.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: They (Congress) dont have a moral, legal or constitutional right to remain in power. They want to stick to power by hook or crook, says Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: The 22 resignation letters are identitical. How can the letters be treated differently, asks Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: This is not a case of defection. This is not a case of tenth schedule. This is a case where 22 MLAs have said they don't want to be part of ruling govt and have resigned, Rohatgi argues.
#MadhyaPradeshPolitics: It is an astounding argument that floor test can happen only after by elections.

A govt which does not have right to continue for one minute wants to continue in power for six months.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Justice Chandrachud says it is mandatory for speaker to test the resignation letters before accepting the same.

Hearing to continue at 2 pm.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Murali Krishnan

Murali Krishnan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @legaljournalist

May 17, 2021
A late night sitting by Kolkata High Court to cancel interim bail granted to two sitting State ministers, one MLA and one former Mayor.
Calcutta* High Court not Kolkata. The chartered High Court legacy.
More interesting news. This was not an appeal against the lower court order but a plea for transfer of trial under Section 407 CrPC.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 21, 2020
Sudarshan News and media regulation: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.

Centre has filed a fresh affidavit calling for regulation of digital media before the court takes up issue of regulation of TV channels.
Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi is appearing on behalf News Broadcasters Federation which has sought impleadment in the matter.
Rohatgi says NBF is the largest body of tv channels in India with 160 members from different parts of the country.

He submits News Broadcasters Association is not representative of news channels and seeks permission to file an affidavit to put forth a self-regulatory mechanism.
Read 18 tweets
Sep 18, 2020
Hearing against Sudarshan News commences before the Supreme Court.
Sanjay Hegde enters appearance on behalf of Zakaf Foundation of India.

"I have a watching brief in this matter. We are not a party to this matter," says Hegde.
Justice DY Chandrachud tells Hegde that Sudarshan News has raised substantial issues against Zakaf Foundation.

"But we are not here to investigate into your client. But Sudarshan News has sought to justify their programme on the grounds of your source of funding"
Read 42 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News and UPSC Jihad: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.
Sr. Counsel Anoop Chaudhuri appearing for petitioner says Sudarshan news has filed an affidavit with vague allegations and submits he wants to file a rejoinder.
Shyam Divan says it was difficult to file a detailed affidavit in two days. We (lawyers) are all in different locations.
We were ambushed by various applications/ interventions, he submits.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News files affidavit before Supreme court defending its programme Bindas Bol and the use of the term "UPSC Jehad".

The affidavit largely focuses on foreign funding received by Zakat Foundation, an orgnisation which supports civil service aspirants.
Sudarshan News has claimed that some such funds received by Zakat Foundation are from terror-linked organisations.

The organisations/ individuals named in the affidavit are Madina Trust, Muslim Aid (UK), Zakat Foundation of America and Zakir Naik
The affidavit says the TV channel has no ill-will against any particular community or individual and do not oppose selection of any meritorious candidate

"There is no statement or message in the four episodes broadcast thatmembers of a particular community should not join UPSC"
Read 8 tweets
Sep 15, 2020
Supreme Court raises grave concerns about the manner in which debates are conducted by certain television channels.

Justice KM Joseph says many times panellists are not allowed to speak and anchor takes up most of the time and panellists are also half-muted.
Supreme Court berates Sudarshan news.

Here is one anchor who says one particular community is trying to gain access to UPSC. Can anything be more insidious than such claims. Such allegations affect stability of country and also casts aspersions on credibility of exam.
In the UPSC exam, all are subject to same tests, interviews and are assessed by same persons. But the insinuation is one community is trying to infiltrate the UPSC. Can such allegations without factual basis be allowed, asks Justice DY Chandrachud?
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(