Murali Krishnan Profile picture
Mar 19, 2020 36 tweets 12 min read Read on X
#MadhyaPradeshFloorTest: If Your Lordships apply law as they are suggesting, then this will happen in every assembly, submits Kapil Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Sibal states that the rebel MLAs took chartered flights.

Questions the same. Why would they do that if they are free, he asks.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: They have manufactured minority. Parties manufacture majority but in this case they have manufactured minority.

The conclusion of the Governor is against all forms of governance without any material, says Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: The chartered flight went from VIDP in Delhi which is a high security area.

It means the central government gave permission.

Landing was also at a high security area - protected HAL airport, states Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: They were accompanied by CISF and BJP members, says Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: What kind of politics is that we cannot go to them, meet them or talk to them.

If such an order is passed then it will have serious impact (in future cases), says Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Governor cannot say that I have lost majority even if I assume the MLAs have sent their resignation.

On what basis did he come to that conclusion so as to order a floor test, asks Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Nabam Rebia judgment does not apply to this case. Any observation which is on aspects similar to this case is obiter, says Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: The only fact before Governor in this case was MLAstendered resignation and nothing else. Even if speaker does not accept majority, will governor come to conclusion that govt lost majority? It shows complete non application of mind (by Governor), says Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Your Lordships should ensure that the Constitution works, not to lay down any precedent that will not make it work, submits Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: When the house is not in session, then the Governor is the Constitutional authority to be approached for seeking a special session, submits Sibal.

"There has never been a case where Governor seeks a floor test when house is in session, never"
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: The way forward for them would be to go for a no-confidence motion.

Why are they brining the Governor into this and trying to take the aid of this Court under Article 32, asks Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Sarkaria Commission and Punchhi commission reports also make it clear that only when the house is prorogued and not in session will the Governor step in.

It has never happened otherwise in the history of this country, says Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Please don't equate power of Governor to summon the house with interference in proceedings of the assembly when it is in session. It will result in Constitutional anarchy, says Sibal.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Sibal concludes.

Vivek Tankha now argues for State of MP.

He argues that Governor should not be part of inter-se politics between parties.

Letter of Governor is pre mature because resignations of MLAs have not been accepted, Tankha says.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Mukul Rohatgi making arguments for BJP MLAs.

Why dont you move to a no confidence motion straight away, asks Justice Chandrachud.

I will answer that, says Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: The best example of running assembly in which Governor exercised powers is SR Bommai.

In Bommai, Karnataka was a running assembly, submits Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: In Bommai, the Governor decided by himself that government is in minority and therefore imposed 356, says Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshFloorTest: The point is whether Governor can fix the agenda for the house when house is in session, asks Justice Chandrachud.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: The speaker is yet to accept resignation. What if the speaker does not accept resignation. The Governor cannot decide whether they have resigned or not, justice Chandrachud.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: Can this court pass an order based on Governor's conclusion, justice Chandrachud asks.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: Why does speaker want two weeks to decide. He is in cahoots with the Chief Minister, Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: If 16 MLAs turn up and vote against them, then the Cong govt falls. If they do not come at all, then also the govt falls because the floor test is based on members present and voting. If they appear and vote for them, then their govt stays, Rohatgi
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: In previous such instances they (Congress) had come to court at midnight and got floor test immediately. In this case, they are asking for two weeks, so that they can horse trade, argues Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis Every day makes a difference in horse trading. It is an unconstitutional game by a govt in minority. Yesterday, he made three districts when this matter is sub-judice, Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: The most fundamental provision of the Constitution is governance by majority.

Governor will be failing in his duty if he did not do what he did, Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: The whole house was sitting (on Monday) and Governor was also there. Suddenly, coronavirus came at 12 in the afternoon and house was adjourned till March 26. No coronavirus at 10 am or 11 am, Rohatgi.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: Rohatgi concludes.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appearing for Governor urges court to pass order expeditiously.

Every passing day makes a difference, says Mehta.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Democracy is not speaker saying he needs two more weeks to decide resignations which were tendered ten days ago, SG Tushar Mehta.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: The only reason they have not accepted resignations of 16 MLAs is that they have not appeared before the speaker despite two notices, Maninder Singh argues for rebel MLAs.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: Why have they kept it pending. What is the objective inquiry that has to take place. What is the objective inquiry which took place with respect to 6 MLAs whose resignations were accepted, asks Maninder Singh asks.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: The six MLAs whose resignations were accepted also did not appear before speaker. To keep resignations pending and insisting that 16 should appear in house are all to buy time, says Maninder Singh.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Governor's powers fully subject to judicial review. Immunity from judicial review of Governor's powers were completely demolished in SR Bommai and Rameshwar Prasad, Sr adv AM Singhvi.
#MadhyaPradeshFloorTest: This is a case in which a minority is manufactured. It is not a case where anybody has staked claim to form government.

If their case is accepted, it will snow ball and fate of governments in future will be decided like this, Sibal says.
#MadhyaPradeshCrisis: Hearing concludes.

Court will assemble again in 10 minutes to inform how it intends to proceed.
#MadhyaPradeshPoliticalCrisis: Supreme Court orders convening of MP assembly on March 20 i.e tomorrow instead of March 26.

It shall be about a single agenda - whether govt enjoys majority.

Floor test to be videographed and to to be concluded by 5 pm on March 20.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Murali Krishnan

Murali Krishnan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @legaljournalist

May 17, 2021
A late night sitting by Kolkata High Court to cancel interim bail granted to two sitting State ministers, one MLA and one former Mayor.
Calcutta* High Court not Kolkata. The chartered High Court legacy.
More interesting news. This was not an appeal against the lower court order but a plea for transfer of trial under Section 407 CrPC.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 21, 2020
Sudarshan News and media regulation: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.

Centre has filed a fresh affidavit calling for regulation of digital media before the court takes up issue of regulation of TV channels.
Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi is appearing on behalf News Broadcasters Federation which has sought impleadment in the matter.
Rohatgi says NBF is the largest body of tv channels in India with 160 members from different parts of the country.

He submits News Broadcasters Association is not representative of news channels and seeks permission to file an affidavit to put forth a self-regulatory mechanism.
Read 18 tweets
Sep 18, 2020
Hearing against Sudarshan News commences before the Supreme Court.
Sanjay Hegde enters appearance on behalf of Zakaf Foundation of India.

"I have a watching brief in this matter. We are not a party to this matter," says Hegde.
Justice DY Chandrachud tells Hegde that Sudarshan News has raised substantial issues against Zakaf Foundation.

"But we are not here to investigate into your client. But Sudarshan News has sought to justify their programme on the grounds of your source of funding"
Read 42 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News and UPSC Jihad: Hearing commences before Supreme Court.
Sr. Counsel Anoop Chaudhuri appearing for petitioner says Sudarshan news has filed an affidavit with vague allegations and submits he wants to file a rejoinder.
Shyam Divan says it was difficult to file a detailed affidavit in two days. We (lawyers) are all in different locations.
We were ambushed by various applications/ interventions, he submits.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 17, 2020
Sudarshan News files affidavit before Supreme court defending its programme Bindas Bol and the use of the term "UPSC Jehad".

The affidavit largely focuses on foreign funding received by Zakat Foundation, an orgnisation which supports civil service aspirants.
Sudarshan News has claimed that some such funds received by Zakat Foundation are from terror-linked organisations.

The organisations/ individuals named in the affidavit are Madina Trust, Muslim Aid (UK), Zakat Foundation of America and Zakir Naik
The affidavit says the TV channel has no ill-will against any particular community or individual and do not oppose selection of any meritorious candidate

"There is no statement or message in the four episodes broadcast thatmembers of a particular community should not join UPSC"
Read 8 tweets
Sep 15, 2020
Supreme Court raises grave concerns about the manner in which debates are conducted by certain television channels.

Justice KM Joseph says many times panellists are not allowed to speak and anchor takes up most of the time and panellists are also half-muted.
Supreme Court berates Sudarshan news.

Here is one anchor who says one particular community is trying to gain access to UPSC. Can anything be more insidious than such claims. Such allegations affect stability of country and also casts aspersions on credibility of exam.
In the UPSC exam, all are subject to same tests, interviews and are assessed by same persons. But the insinuation is one community is trying to infiltrate the UPSC. Can such allegations without factual basis be allowed, asks Justice DY Chandrachud?
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(