Asian American Twitter (which I just discovered is a thing) is very angry about @AndrewYang's latest op-ed saying the best way for AAs to tackle discrimination is to dig in to "American-ness" and fight for a cure.
Andrew here acknowledges the reality of racism, that it is a deeply-embedded (sometimes barely-disguised) neural program often made worse under specific circumstances.
He's clearly making an appeal for empathy and humanity in understanding the roots of this problem.
He underscores that racism is immoral, but highlights that simply yelling "don't be racist" to someone who is actually being racist is not effective.
He's a solutions guy. He calls for a pragmatic approach to "improve the encounter" he described.
People are mad, I think, because he doesn't immediately take a victimhood posture, and rather, looks inward and asks, what can *I* or *we* do differently?
Perhaps he didn't show sufficient anger about the depravity of racism.
This is anathema to modern social justice activism.
Here's where he gets Cathy Newmanned. The reading is that Andrew thinks Asian Americans have to prove their loyalty to Americanness.
That's not what he's saying.
He's saying that it *helps* change the circumstances in which racism flourishes.
His essay is a call from within the community (not imposed from outside) to be aware that our identities are pawns in a larger geopolitical game.
After all, national solidarity matters most at times like this.
He's asking: is there anything we can do to reinforce it?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Chinese analysts, who for years had comfortably repeated the mantra of inevitable American decline - populism, inequality, democracy in crisis - suddenly find their narrative shattered
Prominent voices such as Renmin University's Shi Yinhong called it straight:
the operation proves Washington's military strength remains superior, its warfare methods have evolved further, and the popular Chinese view of US decline is flatly contradicted.
Zheng Yongnian, a key government adviser, hammered the point home: America still holds unparalleled global military power; its war-making rests solely on political will - and that will, under Trump 2.0, turns out to be fiercer than many assumed.
Nanjing University's Zhu Feng added that the US demonstrated the swiftest application of advanced military technology anywhere, posing a direct "cognitive challenge" to China.
Told you not to worry after China to urged its citizens to cancel travel to your country.
Growth due to tourists from mainland China dropped to 3% this month, below the 37.5% growth across the whole year to the compared to the same period the previous year.
But even with this Chinese boycott, overall visitors to Japan grew 10.4% year-on-year this month.
Singaporeans, Malaysians, Indonesians, Taiwanese, South Koreans and Aussies picked up the slack!
Many are flocking over for a PRC-free Japan winter holiday.
This was just a month ago when Ambassador Yamagami responded to my post saying that the rest of Asia Pacific will make up for the tourist shortfall facing 🇯🇵
It's almost impossible to conclusively prove that Harvard's academic output and policy stances are directly influenced by large financial contributions.
All we have is the observable: the timing of these gifts, the meetings that took place, and the outcomes.
A thread🧵
In February 2020, Chinese real estate developer Evergrande Group - yes the one that collapsed - pledged $115 million in funding to a Harvard led consortium, the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness, to research COVID-19.
FOIA documents revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci, the dean of Harvard Medical School George Daley and current President of Harvard (which is suing the Trump admin btw) Alan Garber, were in an email thread with the CEO and Chief Health Officer of Evergrande.
🚨BREAKING: To add to Harvard’s ongoing woes, we have uncovered a shocking new detail.
Harvard University may have violated US sanctions by hosting and providing training sessions for a Chinese paramilitary organization (XPCC)
Here's what we found 🧵
Harvard, along with other top US universities, is already facing intense scrutiny over foreign gifts and contracts that raise concerns about undue foreign influence.
Secretary @LindaMcMahonEd has said that Harvard has not been “fully transparent or complete in its disclosures." The Dept. of Education is currently investigating Harvard’s foreign donations.
Since 2012, Harvard has received over $1.1 billion in foreign funding, with significant contributions from China.
These gifts often come with “strings attached” that potentially comprise academic freedom and lead to partnerships that present huge attack areas for espionage, intellectual property theft, and corruption.
Another instance of journos tainting @elonmusk with the worst possible associations - this time Stalin - based on unnamed sources and baseless claims about filling top positions at OPM (Office of Personnel Management) with his “lackeys”
Let me show you what a pathetic excuse for an article this is 🧵
It opens with a source listing some names of incoming appointees and how they are linked to Elon’s companies.
Then they quote a professor from Harvard Kennedy School of Government who says “in the past, there have been one or maybe two political appointees in ALL of OPM”
The idea is that THIS year is an exception.
But a cursory look into the plumbook shows that in 2024, there were at least 17 political appointees in Biden’s OPM, excluding the open director slot.