Asian American Twitter (which I just discovered is a thing) is very angry about @AndrewYang's latest op-ed saying the best way for AAs to tackle discrimination is to dig in to "American-ness" and fight for a cure.
Andrew here acknowledges the reality of racism, that it is a deeply-embedded (sometimes barely-disguised) neural program often made worse under specific circumstances.
He's clearly making an appeal for empathy and humanity in understanding the roots of this problem.
He underscores that racism is immoral, but highlights that simply yelling "don't be racist" to someone who is actually being racist is not effective.
He's a solutions guy. He calls for a pragmatic approach to "improve the encounter" he described.
People are mad, I think, because he doesn't immediately take a victimhood posture, and rather, looks inward and asks, what can *I* or *we* do differently?
Perhaps he didn't show sufficient anger about the depravity of racism.
This is anathema to modern social justice activism.
Here's where he gets Cathy Newmanned. The reading is that Andrew thinks Asian Americans have to prove their loyalty to Americanness.
That's not what he's saying.
He's saying that it *helps* change the circumstances in which racism flourishes.
His essay is a call from within the community (not imposed from outside) to be aware that our identities are pawns in a larger geopolitical game.
After all, national solidarity matters most at times like this.
He's asking: is there anything we can do to reinforce it?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I wonder how different our world would be like if our leaders and intelligentsia weren't so completely divorced from violence - both simulated or real.
Ancient Greek thinkers such as Plato - meaning "broad shoulders," so named because of a physique honed by wrestling - were not
merely men who lived their lives in their heads, pontificating in abstraction away from any understanding of savagery and the zero sum nature of conflict. Both Hemingway and Orwell fought in the Spanish Civil War.
Today, the stereotype that characterizes our erudite class is the
bespectacled tweed-wearing waif who turns down his nose at the idea of physicality. UFC, wrestling, heay weight lifting - these are signifiers of low social status or of a lesser intellect.
We need an elite who is in constant contact with reality, who
Affirmative Action backfires in many ways, failing to help the minority students it purports to help. Blacks feel like they don’t belong; Asians feel resentful.
Singapore rejects AA but has a solution that has seen success
“Like many of the other ideas pushed during the racial reckoning (see: defund the police), affirmative action appears to be yet another manifestation of what @robkhenderson has so astutely called “luxury beliefs.” Does the actual fate of these students not matter as much as their… https://t.co/2UEJXrfuEgtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
“Asians have to score 450 points higher than black students & 150 points higher than whites to have the same chance of admission to Harvard.”
“Majority of Americans oppose affirmative action at public universities by a margin of 74% to 26%, including a solid majority of Dems”
In the early 2000s when I left Singapore for America, most Singaporeans admired the US.
My sense being back here these days is that not only is it no longer true, there's a considerable amount of contempt for America due to its cultural export of woke garbage.
Relatives and
high school friends who I never once ever talked politics with my whole life suddenly are eager to engage me on how American politics and how "crazy America has become."
Sometimes it's about crime, sometimes it's about lawlessness or the homeless/drug epidemic, but increasingly
it's about "the gender stuff."
They ask me why this is going on, and how it came to pass that reality is actively being denied en masse. They name-drop Professor @jordanbpeterson and @benshapiro, and tell me they've all seen my clips on Joe Rogan and other pods.
Of course it took a journalist who reported on China, Russia and Egypt to say this: calling the Lab Leak Theory disinformation, was itself, disinformation.
the formation of the narrative (that lab leak = conspiracy theorist / racist), how it evolved into "consensus," and explains how the folks vested with the authority to create the consensus had huge conflicts of interest.
It's clear to me that the epistemic process is no
longer permitted to run its course. Because as soon as the "wrong people" (in this case Trump and his ilk) took a position, it was practically instinctual for the entire media industrial complex to take the opposite stand. And they did.