Thread by @MalwareJake

I remember reading this first from @TinkerSec, but I really wonder how long until people start expanding their social circles to others with whom they share a common set of precautions?

This of course can't expand far AND requires EXTREME levels of trust among those involved. 1/

Until rapid tests are available on a widespread basis, I would expect these circles simply can't expand to people who work outside the home (too much risk), further expanding the the class divide.

You of course assume the risks of anyone you choose to have contact with. 2/

Who do you know in your social circle that you trust enough to risk your own personal safety (and that of those you live with)? Because that's the real question.

There are acquaintances, there are friends, and then there are friends you trust with your life. 3/

It's easy to assume that last group is larger than it is. If you're in a high risk category, I think it's easier to expand to others in high risk categories. The logic is that all of you know this will likely kill YOU and that changes "safety of others" to "self preservation" 4/

But really, even if you don't think it's your life, who do you trust with your health? My list is pretty short.

That list gets much smaller when I don't know everyone they are interacting with and the precautions they're taking. Ugh, this hurts my brain to think about. 5/

But I think this IS doable for some SMALL, select groups. I know a few people who are (who will remain anonymous) doing this with select family outside the home and others who have brought family into their homes.

Anyone thinking about this that wants to share? /FIN

One more note: I'm not advocating that ANYONE act irresponsibly or violate local laws or regulations.

This is NOT a recommendation, it's just an interesting thought exercise. Again, when risk is high and absolute trust is low, it's hard to see this actually working at scale.