Alice R Fraser Profile picture
Apr 11, 2020 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Because #Savage is coming out on @PrimeVideo on the 17th of April, I will celebrate with a thread of some behind the scenes facts:
1/
There’s a very mild joke about Tom Cruise running around corners that Legals flagged, asking me if I’d like to change the name in case of litigation. I said I’d keep it in because if I’m just mentioning the fact that a man has run around some corners, it’s not quite a joke.
2/ I said I wanted #Savage cut very intimate - not glitzy or glam. I said none of those “from behind the comedian” shots of big lights/audience. But I changed my mind because they chose a very flattering angle and when I get old, I would like to reminisce about my younger butt
3/ I cut most of the songs out of the final edit because I was so nervous my hands were shaking and my voice was squeaky and I forgot words despite having done them literally hundreds of times before, but...
4/ ... Also I figured I needed the songs less in a screen version than live in the room where the tension is more intense and needs breaking. I still don’t know how much of this is post hoc rationalisation. There’s also a third reason but I’ll talk about that another time.
I let them do makeup but insisted on doing my own hair, which involves rinsing it, finger-combing some product through, letting it dry in a tshirt overnight, sticking a couple of pins in & calling it a day. I regret not letting them try it, (but once it’s fucked, it IS fucked)
More later or tomorrow. I’ll add to this thread through the week until the release of #Savage on Amazon Prime on 17 April. X

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alice R Fraser

Alice R Fraser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aliterative

Apr 14, 2022
So here’s a thing I think. As a society, we carve out ‘outside’ or ‘safe’ spaces for old people, disabled people and babies (parents with babies). That distorts normal society in truly awful ways. 🧵
One of which is relevant to covid calculations. Because we have homes that are separated from the mainstream of life, we don’t see sick people or old people out & about - they’re not integrated into normal daily life. As a result, they become distanced; phased out of our lives.
This is all convenient, and means you don’t have to spend time behind a very old lady at the supermarket. Also, as a side effect; deaths in older people from things like covid become invisible and abstract. They’re already in the liminal ‘out’, so WHEN they die is cushioned.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 28, 2020
I get asked what advice I’d give to kids, and I don’t know, but basic emotional skills I think kids should learn in schools are:

1.at some point, you’ll be in love with someone who doesn’t want you. Here’s some ways to deal with that gracefully.
2. at some point someone will be in love with you, who you don’t want. Here’s how you might cope with that humanely.
3.Sometimes someone will push your boundaries in a way that feels uncomfortable. Here’s how to express your discomfort.
4.Some ways to deescalate conflict.
5.Sometimes someone will hate you, and here’s some ways to address that but also sometimes you just have to let someone hate you.
6.If a relationship of any kind makes you feel bad every time you meet, whether it’s a dentist or a friend, walk away and find another one.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 25, 2020
The logic of commercial litigation is “do what you can get away with”. A senior partner once said, when I flagged a clause that was clearly not what the other side had asked for: “that’s for their lawyer to catch”. Fine, but we CAN’T have this adversarial model in government.
Adversarial processes are wonderful for pushing progress; they engage human inventiveness in ways that sameness of thinking doesn’t. In a legal system, it’s a decent methodology. But for governing, adversarial attitudes have to bend to a shared interest in the good of the people.
So for example, when there are checks and balances in place in government, they are not ‘the enemy’ of the government. They’re the road lane markings, the speed limits, the traffic control lights. If you think of every traffic light as your enemy, the road gets very dangerous.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 2, 2020
Tips for men worried that they can’t tell if they’ve made a woman uncomfortable (THREAD): 1. never stand between a woman and the door - both literally and metaphorically. Indicate to your colleague, crush, friend, date etc. a clearly marked exit with lights along the floor. 1/?
1b. And not in a halfarsed way, not with implications that it’ll be really hurtful if she goes, not ironically or jokingly or rolling your eyes.
2.If you’re not sure whether she’s into you, it, the situation, assume she’s not, or ask straight up, with reference to point 1. 2/?
3.If you possibly can, try imagining what it’s like to be her. As though she were a fully formed human being with hopes and dreams. If you can’t imagine, ask. If you can imagine, ask anyway, maybe you’re imagining wrong. 3/?
Read 7 tweets
Aug 26, 2020
I would like to propose a tiered system of fonts; like pen licenses. So unqualified idiots can pretend they know what they’re talking about online, but they have to do it in comic sans.
If it’s your area of training or expertise, you get times new roman. People with 10+ years of practical experience in the field get Helvetica Neue.
Have been informed in a tweet that using comic sans as an example for font indicating least qualifications in a hierarchy of reference is ableist. Also in another tweet that hating comic sans is not ableist. Unfortunately, no font variations, so I can’t tell who is right.
Read 4 tweets
May 26, 2020
Whether something’s a joke or not almost always runs perpendicular to its moral vector. I’m frustrated with “but it’s funny” or “it’s not funny” as arguments on if X is cruel or offensive. That’s like arguing against “it’s too hot” with “but it’s liquid!”. You can have hot liquid
ON THE OTHER HAND. A joke can demonstrate an abhorrent moral position, and that’s the joke. This is a way of playing with/demonstrating the boundaries of acceptability. Saying an outrageous thing that ‘we’ all know is awful BECAUSE we all know it’s awful is an in-group signal.
Such jokes become more likely to hurt someone’s feelings now, when it’s become infinitely harder to limit who is ‘in the room’, so the meaning can’t be controlled by the joker. Ie, you might say “who can I kill for you” to mean “I love you” to your beloved, but not in a reply all
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(