So we're holding a debate tonight on mainstream media coverage of COVID-19 featuring hopefully, YOU! + @JohnGable & @juliemastrine from @AllSidesNow. If you follow us @braverangels you should follow All Sides.
...on The Braver Angels Podcast alongside my partner @ciaranjoconnor, radio host Denise Quinn & the phenomenal @moniguzman whose empathetic insights into race, politics and media are a buried treasure.
...Americans need realize our ability to shape the future depends on what we do in civil society to build stronger communities & institutions more responsive to the needs of the American people.
Government is the problem. Corporations too. Also, neither are. Lets go deeper. 3/6
We can't wait for pre-existing powerful structures to do the work of rebuilding trust between the American people and the health of our political life.
There has to be movement more closely connected to the culture and aspirations of Americans AS PEOPLE. We can transform...4/6
...civic & social life in America ways that honor our diverse heritage and advances well being. That is what #weavingcommunity is all about.
But to do that we have to connect with each other directly - & realize we can build influence with people we never thought we'd...(5/6)
...come together with, to uplift social prosperity in the interests of the nation that all Americans share.
So check out the debate tonight. Help us build this organization and this American movement. Be a part of what is next for @braverangels.
An opportunity was lost with the collapse of the #IntellectualDarkWeb. Logic only travels so far in the absence of social trust, and building trust rich social networks across tribes is extremely hard to do.
We live in an era of echo chambers. I won't listen to your information because I don't trust your sources, because I see them as being ill-motivated and not just potentially wrong.
Wherever you stand on voter fraud, the Covid vaccine (both of which Sam and I get in to...)
...there is a need to sustain the attention of vastly different thinking people on a singular topic where information is being discussed that conflicts with their biases.
Most of us can listen to such information if it is coming from someone whose intentions we trust. If not...
I detect sarcasm from my friend @fullydavid, but let me address it. Because part of the value in speaking to Dave Rubin was to give me the chance to speak to other things.
I won't tag Rubin here because I don't think it's necessary. Others will do what they will. [1/43]
Here of course is the conversation, for The John Wood Jr. Show, that occasions the subject: [2/43]
Working with @braverangels I and my colleagues constantly disappoint people. Some people like the idea of good faith dialogue and empathy but draw lines as to who should be invited into such spaces. We've gotten backlash for engaging figures like Hawk Newsome, James Comey..[3/43]
But I also have to say something about it's aftermath.
This conversation was a victory because it showed an exchange between knowledgeable individuals on both sides of a highly charged topic that clarified differences, tested logical rigor & allowed for further reasoning on the subject.
It did so while maintaining a respect...
...and congeniality that would grant ppl on both sides of the conversation psychological permission to continue exploring in good faith.
These are the circumstances that allow us to learn from one another while also being able to function together socially.
Welcoming @tristanharris to the pod in an hour. A man to be admired.
Likewise @coldxman. In their recent convo Coleman makes a point I'd like to drill to the center of everyone's brains.
Generically politically informed people are as bias prone as anyone. More statistics...
...do not reduce tribal impulses that filter such information through its prejudices. Perversely therefore "recommending people get more informed may even exacerbate the problem."
"It's not a problem of intelligence. It's a much deeper problem." He's right.
Now as Tristan...
...points out there are different ways of being informed. It is the polarizing narrative structures (my language) that inform us in ways that inflame our biases and abridges our contextual understanding (most of this is not just flat out lies, though some is).
So at @braverangels we commissioned a poll from @YouGov to survey American's thoughts about the possibility of violence following a contested election, and the possibility that the election may in fact be rigged.