@jhooks 10. @gwern's sprawling, info-packed wiki with hover previews, TOCs, and a public change log
@jhooks @gwern 11. Speaking of hover previews, @JoshWComeau's experiment with Tippy.js this week is a fanstastic example of adding contextual layers to links -
@jhooks @gwern @JoshWComeau 12. Also related, @swyx's writing on Webmentions and Twitter as a "meta-commentary layer to the internet" follows this same vibe of bi-directional densely-linked knowledge across platforms - swyx.io/writing/twitte…
13. To come back to @tomcritchlow for a moment, as far as I can tell from internet-history-digging they OG coined the term "digital garden" 🌱 and have a wonderful series of reflections on the concept here: tomcritchlow.com/blogchains/dig…
14. Update on the historical origin!
Thanks to @tomcritchlow and @BillSeitz for the backstory insights
The linkbacks flow through Mike Caufield's "The Garden and the Stream: A Technopastoral"
16. Overdue addition to the list, but @swyx has an entire 'Digital Garden Terms of Service' agreement!
A beautifully reflection on what we should expect as readers and gardeners - Epistemic disclosure, proper attribution, and the right to be wrongswyx.io/writing/digita…
@swyx 17. This collection has now matured into a full grown essay documenting the history of "digital gardening" as an ethos 🌲 maggieappleton.com/garden-history
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Okay, in the middle of a good mystery / concerning epistemological quandary.
Found an Etsy shop selling *beautiful* "William Morris" prints. Gorgeously illustrated nature scenes. Very Morris vibes. His name in giant letter at the bottom.
...but Morris never did illustration work, and certainly not to this level of detail and range of colours. The guy did textile prints in the mid-1800's!
Actual Morris prints look like this.
Still great. But, uh, different.
Except there's *nothing* on this giant (700+ print) Etsy store suggesting their artwork isn't from Morris. No other artist name. No disclaimer this is "Morris-inspired" or anything like that.
Found multiple Etsy stores like this. Filled with beautiful illustration work, labelled as Morris work. But not at all by Morris.
At this point I can't fully tell what's real Morris and what's Etsyfied-HighDef-4k-Morris, and the web isn't helping me figure it out.
Starting to suspect the fake HD Morris work is just a well-crafted Midjourney prompt.
But is this what happens? We all just run art history through enhanced AI filters to make it brighter, more colorful, more detailed, more aesthetic, and then fail to label it as such??
Hosted the latest edition of Future of Code here in London on Thursday. So many bangers.
Delayed thread with snaps and demo videos!
Oscar (@ocuatrecasas) from @fermat_app built a node and wire interface for chaining language model calls + image identification + multiplayer user inputs
Crowd favourite @MathigonOrg by @PhilippLegner
The shock and awe just kept building and building...
New @tana_inc folks seem hungry for in-depth books on ontologies & schemas.
Initial reaction was... books are overkill? There's not much to know? Just google it? But then tried googling. And it is *noisy* and poorly curated out there.
A few recommendations:
Original semantic web/structured data content does a good job of explaining ontologies in an accessible way.
This paper "Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology" (2001) covers almost all the essentials in ~23 pages cs.upc.edu/~jvazquez/teac…
I inadvertently learned a lot about ontologies by practicing Object-oriented UX (OOUX), similar to the "Conceptual Models" design ethos developed at PARC and built off object-oriented programming