If you favor a more aggressive posture on reopening it might help to clarify which of these—not mutually exclusive—you agree with:
1 The health costs will be less bad than we assume
2 The economic/social costs are worse than we assume
3 We should be less willing to trade 2 for 1
1 The health costs will be less bad than we assume
2 The economic/social costs are worse than we assume
3 We should be less willing to trade 2 for 1
This is not meant to sound one-sided. The same holds in reverse if you take a particularly conservative/cautious posture on re-opening. It just seems like people are talking past one another a lot.
A related hypothesis: I think people are often *really* arguing about 3 when they're ostensibly arguing about 1 or 2.
