this 3d welcomes criticism.
Since the outbreak started, Italy adopted "quarantine at home" policy
Currently 80K mild cases are quarantined at home
The national lockdown started on the 20th of March
here covid19mm.github.io/in-progress/20…
so why on earth R0 in italy/lombardia is R0 still circa 1?
2/
Secondary Attack Rate (SAR) times Contacts
and can be broken down in 4 components
R0 Household
R0 Work
R0 Schooling
Ro Community
crossing Ciro and Michele work with google location, since the lockdown started we know that social contacts due to 3/
Work is circa 40%-60%
Community is circa 10%
Household is 100%
of the pre-lockdown level
Summarising, we can reasonably say R0s+R0w+R0c is down 84% vs pre-lockdown
R0h is instead unchanged.
NB the average family in Italy is 2.4 members
4/
and R0 post lockdown (now) is circa 1
we can reasonably say that the decrease in R0 post lockdown is due almost entirely to R0w+R0s+Roc going down due to lower social contacts (84%)
So....here we go 5/
Centralized quarantine was enforced by the 1st of February.
As a consequence R0 dropped to 0.32 from 1.2
Wuhan Impact on NPI on R0 here medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
& also see 3d by @AdamJKucharski on SARh
7/
If not so, the point is that i dont see how R0 in Italy can go substantially below 1 if Italy keeps quarantining at home
8/8
@CrossWordsCW @ThManfredi @AurelianoStingi @Doom3Gloom @IgorFobia @davidemancino1 @udogumpel @OGiannino @giapao @PaoloBricco
one of the reason i might be wrong is delay in communications
so we may be seen "backlog unwinding" of infected, tests and so on.
That being true after 1 month from the lockdown, would cast lot of shadows on capacity to manage phase 2