A thread...
Very important. If your definition doesn’t align with the AMC, you will always be frustrated.
Extreme outperformance is never questioned. It should be - it reveals a lot including tail risks.
This will tell you why performance is sustainable. Even nothing is fine - an AMCs edge could be just distribution. It’s good to know.
Every one will underperform at some point. You might as well know when to be prepared?
Fund teams should be supported in a bad run, rather than made to change strategies. The ability to weather it out matters!
This will help you invest and diversify in different styles of investing across funds.
Critical especially for illiquid asset classes like mid caps and credit. Being too big and too illiquid to fail is the reason funds fail.
Funds that have diversified investor bases are sell prone to large single day redemptions that hit your NAV.
Consistency of fund team is very important for a scheme.
Boundaries protect investors. The small things like debt in hybrid funds can kill you. Policy helps!
I love the AMC business and I love MFs. Better questions means better answers, and more informed investors.
Happy investing!