My Authors
Read all threads
1/n #SadarPranam to Ishvara within you @NitinRaut_INC ji.

U are completely unaware of the "Constituent Assembly Debates."

In this thread, I show how Dr.Ambedkar had rejected the amendment to insert"Secular, Socialist"in the Constitution. U may reply shud u hv enough substance.
2/n I'm referring to the "Constituent Assembly Debate of November 15, 1948".

Prof K T Shah wanted to move an amendment clause(1) of article-1 & insert "Secular, Federal, Socialist".

@NitinRaut_INC u must have heard Prof K T Shah's name at least, right?
3/n Dr.Ambedkar outrightly rejected the amendment by citing two reasons.

Firstly, according to him, "socialist" is a political stand & the same cannot be imposed upon people, and its insertion would destroy democracy altogether.

(details in snippet)
4/n Secondly, Dr. Ambedkar mentions article 31.

@NitinRaut_INC , Dr.Ambedkar asked Prof. Shah:

"If these directive principles to which I have drawn attention are not socialistic in their direction and in their content, I fail to understand what more socialism can be?"
5/n @NitinRaut_INC , the point is that Dr.Ambedkar considered the state's policy towards people's welfare to be "socialist" (article-31) but he was completely against the "Socialism" to be imposed upon Citizen's of India.

These are two different aspects. Nitin ji, retrospect.
6/n @NitinRaut_INC ji, now you may say that Dr.Ambedkar never spoke about "Secularism" that day, then my answer would be that you better use a bit of common sense.

Dr.Ambedkar had rejected Prof.Shah's amendment move to insert, "Secular, Federal, Socialist" altogether.
7/n @NitinRaut_INC ji, it is appalling that despite being an important office-bearer of @INCIndia , you are so unaware even about the "Constituent Assembly Debates."

@INCIndia , I request you to train your people about these important aspects. Shame.
8/n I knew someone would come with such stupid argument and hence didn't finish the thread.
@vivekagnihotri 's question was "what was Dr.Ambedkar's opinion about the insertion of two Ss in the Constitution." Your Minister answered in rhetoric, I gave facts
9/n I have a name, though you can call me Bhakt. It is not about what Dr.Ambedkar's views were, the point is why he rejected the insertion of "Secular, Socialist" which Indira Gandhi did insert.
In Ambedkar's PoV, Muslims can not ever be nationalist, so?
10/n @shirazmahad , Dr.Ambedkar had clearly said that though "Socialism" can be the flavour of the season but it doesn't mean it becomes ideology for citizens.

Read again what Ambedkar argued & don't waste my time. Come with evidence and debate or else pl stay away.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!