It’s #lesbianvisibilityweek and, as ever, I find myself thinking about how my visibility as a lesbian is so connected with that of many other women, especially butch women, lesbians of colour, transwomen who identify as lesbian, and non-binary people seen as lesbian.
I know and recognise that my ability to pass (should I ever wish to) is a product of my perceived distinction from those whose self-presentation puts them more immediately in a viewer’s definition of ‘lesbian’. The costs they bear can be considerable & I thank them for it.
The most important way, for me, to show my thanks is not to hide; not to retreat into the shadows offered by lazy and often homophobic and misogynistic constructions of dykey-ness. Happily my family and loved ones have never asked or expected me to.
In my working life, I feel so lucky to work in a place with so many queer women, many of whom identify as lesbian and many of whom are in leadership positions @bhamlaw and @artsatbham.
And to our @bhamlaw and @unibirmingham queer- and lesbian-identifying students now finding themselves in inhospitable or hostile spaces, unable to express their sexual identity with comfort or freedom, we are here for you. DMs are open; we see and value you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've been off for a few weeks and barely looking at the papers, but of course caught the news re A Level results yest (btw young people: ignore the begrudgers). Given the (comparatively v. weird) way uni offers work in the UK, there are going to be BIG first year cohorts. 1/?
As a result, lots of places are going to be hiring many people v quickly. Some of these jobs will be permanent but many (most?) will likely be fixed-term teaching-focused jobs with little or no research time built in, esp. if unis plan not to maintain this intake size. 2/?
This puts ECRs, including people just coming out of PhDs, into a difficult position. People need jobs: they have bills and lives and they have worked extremely hard on slender or no scholarships for a long time. Of course they will apply for and get these jobs. 3/?
This is awful and I just can't understad how we have come to this, but I have some thoughts... theguardian.com/education/2020…
First the obvious bit: the university sector has for decades been marketised & commercialised by government policy, made responsible for its own financial viability. As a result, it has built a (very profitable) infrastructure around a mode of delivery and 'student experience'.
That infrastructure includes accommodation (often tens of thousands of places), meal plans, sports facility memberships etc. In the absence of meaningful government support for the HE sector during the pandemic, these remain essential sources of income for unis.
A near-lockdown is starting to feel rather inevitable. I am so pleased that we were able to relocate to South Devon this week and work, walk, eat, relax here for a change of scenery. It's been a tonic, and we are sharply aware of how lucky we are to have been able to do it.
What surprised me was the deep melancholy I got this week. The scenery and walking are wonderful in their own way, but they are not the kind of holiday activities that fill me up and restore me. I need museums, galleries, busy streets, energy, exploring cities, deciphering menus.
On top of it all it became pretty clear to me that the return to the office that I have been *aching* for, and which I anticipated happening on Monday, might not happen at all or for long. I miss my room, my colleagues, the campus so much. It's another place that gives me energy.
"These were in many respects the bad old days, unworthy of anyone’s nostalgia. There was too little transparency, permitting countless small abuses...favouritism and prejudice...laissez-faire concealed unequal workloads and, in some cases, sheer indolence" lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v42/…
"...half of UK universities’ £40 billion annual income comes from fees...Academic heads of department...are set aspirational admissions targets which often prove unachievable due to the vicissitudes of an unstable market. The usual outcome... is misery over happiness"
"Even if it’s a good thing for fee-paying students to have a say in what their money buys, a transactional mentality has led to paradoxical demands for more contact hours and the right not to use them...Unlike other...services...students get out of a degree what they put in"
"demanding a Christmas suspension of pandemic hostilities...attempt[s] to maintain the illusion that we’re in charge...I don’t want Christmas to be cancelled either, but...it’s not about Christmas, really. It’s about not wanting darkness to swallow us up" theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
On the idea of Christmas being 'cancelled': I increasingly feel like maybe Christmas, which will be different, might be more meaningful. No crazy shopping, scaled down meals, no big parties, no painful 'office parties'. Instead: quiet days, long walks, time together, TV movies.
I don't have children so I know that my Christmas is different. But maybe a scaled back Christmas would be nice for children too, including (whisper it) Santy having a budget (like before!). Could we revert to a big present, a small present, & a surprise?
Oh. Oh dear. If we were writing formative feedback we might start with the killer phrase ‘I can see you have given this paper some thought, and there are some interesting ideas here, however....’
‘It would have been helpful had you paid closer attention to the differences between international legal obligations, and constitutionally permitted legislative action as a matter of domestic law’ etc
Very seriously: there will be public and international law tutorials devoted solely to using this ‘opinion’ as a teaching tool in a. the relationship between national and international law, and b. the importance of critically assessing the accuracy and weight of sources...