Now let’s go to published official literature, and see what it reveals. Spoiler alert: the admitted holes and shortcomings of the test are devastating. fda.gov/media/134922/d… @realDonaldTrump 
From the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans” who.int/emergencies/di… @realDonaldTrump
From the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary: ACCELERATED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARYCOVID-19 RT-PCR TEST (LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA)”
fda.gov/media/136151/d… @realDonaldTrump
fda.gov/media/136151/d… @realDonaldTrump
From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” creative-diagnostics.com/sars-cov-2-cor… @realDonaldTrump
Proponents of the test assert that it CAN measure how much virus is in the body.
To which I reply: prove it.
Prove it in a way it should have been proven decades ago—but never was.
The test is an unproven fraud. lewrockwell.com/2020/04/jon-ra… @realDonaldTrump
To which I reply: prove it.
Prove it in a way it should have been proven decades ago—but never was.
The test is an unproven fraud. lewrockwell.com/2020/04/jon-ra… @realDonaldTrump
