Monique Hawkins Profile picture
May 6, 2020 21 tweets 4 min read Read on X
I was invited yesterday to have a Covid-19 PCR test (I am not a keyworker, but as a volunteer using the COVID Symptom Tracker).

I thought I'd just set out my experience of the testing process.
Firstly, I was impressed with the smoothness of the test booking process.

The self-test kits to be sent home were no longer available for my chosen day.

But I'm lucky that I can drive, and I was given a choice of test sites near me, and there were spaces available.
I was very keen to not have to do the test myself, so I was reassured that the centre I chose (Cattle Market Car Park) said that there would be a choice between having someone administer the test, or me doing the test myself.
I turned up today, had to show the barcode that had been emailed to me, and someone placed a testkit on the passenger seat of my car, gave me some instructions about placing a barcode sticker on a test receipt card, and told me to park up and put my hazard lights on when ready.
Once my hazard lights were on, the next person turned up and started showing me photos of tonsils and noses and instructions on where to swab and for how long.

At this point I felt panic and said 'but I don't want to do it myself, I was told someone would do this for me!'
The reply was that they were not qualified to do it, and explained again about the swab - 5 seconds to the right of my tonsils, 5 to the left, 5 in the middle, then 5 in a nostril. And don't touch tongue or teeth because that would invalidate the test.
I tried to do it. It made me gag, I'm sure I've done it wrong - it's really difficult to do this to yourself. Anyway I did the best I could but I'm worried this test will have been for nothing.

Once done, back to hazard lights on.
This time I was given instructions on sealing the bag (having placed bar code stickers on the bag and the test tube).

I was told very clearly that once home, I must click on the link in the text message I had already received, and that would allow me to scan the barcode.
Finally, I was told to drive to the exit to hand over my test, and the last barcode.

At the exit, I handed over bag and final barcode, and was given strict instructions to phone the telephone phone number on the test receipt card BEFORE THIS EVENING.
I said 'oh but your previous colleague told me I needed to scan the barcode'?

He said 'You MUST phone the number'

I said 'ok, I will - but just thought I'd point out that you and your colleagues are giving different instructions'

He shrugged so I left.
At home I first tried to use the link, and entered (not scanned) my barcode. It said it was already registered and I couldn't register it again.

I then thought I'd better do as I told, and rung the number.
I got through to an automated service, with quite confusing options. If I was ringing before 4 hours after the test, and I hadn't yet received a text message….

I thought - best to wait till 4 hours have passed.
4 hours later, no new text message had arrived, so I rang again, and got through to a very helpful person.

She asked me all my details (name, date of birth, barcode, postcode), and finally the test centre. I told her, but she couldn't find it….
She spent 10 minutes trying to find the test centre where I'd just been today, and couldn't find it. She said there were quite a lot of teething troubles - some test centres were out of date, others were new (pop-up) and not on their list yet.
Yet I had chosen the test centre on a Gov.UK website!

She explained that 99% of the time anyway, people who had a barcode were already registered and didn't need to ring (I'm getting so confused) .
She said that if I wanted reassurance, then I could ring my NHS trust instead, and they would be able to tell. She was really apologetic - also explaining that of course she was working from home, having to message supervisors rather than having anyone with her.
I have no complaint about this person at all - but really the system is incredibly not joined up.
I explained to her as well that I was really unhappy about having had to do the test myself, and she said if I'd gone to a leisure centre instead of a pop-up site, there would have been qualified people to do the test.
But how on earth was I supposed to know that? My site wasn't labelled as a pop-up site, and it specifically said I would have the choice of doing the test myself or having someone else administer it!
Anyway, I now have to wait between 2 and 5 days to get the result of the test. I'm fairly sure I do not have Covid-19, and so I'm not worried for myself.
However I really hope that the test actually worked. Because I'm worried that amongst the tens of thousands of tests now done every day there may be many invalid ones.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Monique Hawkins

Monique Hawkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @monlouhawk

Aug 7, 2023
Are you, like me, a dual national living in the UK with both British and EU passports?

I predict travelling to the EU will become much more annoying in a few years time, and that we'll be prevented from checking in online.

Unless we pay for something we don't need.

Thread 🧵
Once both the UK and the EU have introduced their travel authorisation systems, then unless airlines change their systems fundamentally I think we won’t be able to check in online for one leg of the journey.

Unless we pay extra.

Let me try to explain.
The UK intends to introduce Electronic Travel Authorisations (ETA).

It will cost £10.

Will I need one?

says I don't.

I have a British passport, and I have permission to live and work in the UK. https://t.co/0Vwf8ernYCgov.uk/guidance/elect…
Image
Read 17 tweets
Mar 18, 2021
What democracy looks like: (short thread)

I just voted in Dutch general elections. I voted for one of the parties that wasn't VVD (sorry Mark Rutte).

If the Dutch used First Past the Post, Mark would've been able to rule the Netherlands however he wants - just look at this map
However, despite the fact that his party was the largest party in most councils, his party only actually got around 22 or 23% of the total vote.

So - his job now is to find other parties so that between them, they represent over 50% of the country's vote.

Which is fab - why?
Three reasons.

1️⃣ my vote didn't end up in the bin - instead it properly contributed to the number of seats of my chosen party

2️⃣ one party doesn't get freedom to dictate its entire manifesto on a 23% vote share

3️⃣ compromise and consensus building is built in
Read 5 tweets
Oct 18, 2020
The @the3million letter writing campaign to your MPs has been amazing this week! We thought the House of Lords letter writing was awesome but almost three times as many of you have written to MPs so far.

A few reflections so far…

deniedmybackup.org/contact-your-mp
First and most important, it is working!

Whatever happens in the House of Commons debate (and we can take a guess, given how the Govt whips MPs to vote), the message IS getting through and MPs ARE beginning to question the digital-only status.

We are winning the argument.
One Conservative MP mentioned the standard soundbites then added "However I do understand the predicament you have that you cannot print the evidence and digital proof cannot always be accessed"
Read 11 tweets
Oct 15, 2020
While I welcome the promises in this article towards those who don't apply for status under the EU settlement scheme, because they are considered to have a "reasonable grounds" (it mentions example of 8-yr old 'looked-after' child), I am very confused. 1/
theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
In the article, @AlbertoCostaMP says that "the minister [@kevin_j_foster] has assured parliament that EU nationals who fail to apply by the grace period deadline of 30 June will remain legally here if they have a reasonable excuse".

I would be overjoyed if that were true. 2/
After all, it is one of the problems that @the3million has been highlighting in the absence of a declaratory status. (see 'Interim Status' on page 2 of our briefing t3m.org.uk/t3m_SafeSettle…).

Amendment 3 on the Immigration Bill seeks to address this (@childrensociety) 3/
Read 6 tweets
Oct 4, 2020
EU citizens will have to rely on a digital-only status to prove their rights after June next year.

To me, it is sheer common sense that a physical backup is needed, because digital - while lovely when it works - doesn't always work.

I've been arguing this from...
... first principles for almost two years now.

We know large computer systems often fail - in general.

But recently, the list of just Government IT failures have been staggering.

Let me list a few, then tell me that EU citizens don't need a physical backup of their status.
Let's first just look at the passage of the immigration bill through parliament. (I've chosen that bill because there's an amendment on it, to give us physical proof of status, to be debated and voted on tomorrow, Monday 5th October).
Read 9 tweets
Sep 30, 2020
My lovely (widowed) mum lives in the Netherlands. If she needs my help in future, I want to be able to move and look after her.

If I had JUST UNTIL MARCH 2022 to be able to make that move and bring my British husband, I would be in a total panic.

Luckily, the Dutch government..
.. recognises how unfair that would be, given that I moved to the UK under EU free movement.

So they've clearly stated that I will keep that right (to bring my British husband to NL) for my lifetime.

The UK government on the other hand, is not being so kind to its own citizens.
They are ripping that right away from British citizens who, under EU free movement had legitimate expectation they could return to the UK in future with their family.

Why are they doing this?

It's genuinely beyond me. We're talking a finite group of people.

The excuse given is
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(