In four days, the Supreme Court will hear @realDonaldTrump v. @DeutscheBank – probably the last chance for the public to look inside Trump's finances before the 2020 election.
It's not too late to read about how we got here. amazon.com/Dark-Towers-De…
It's not too late to read about how we got here. amazon.com/Dark-Towers-De…
If you plan to pay attention to Tuesday's Supreme Court hearing in Trump v. Deutsche Bank, there's one document in particular you should familiarize yourself with: the 2019 subpoena that Congress sent to DB for Trump's records – and that Trump sued to quash.
Here it is.
Here it is.
Among the things this subpoena demands:
- DB's internal records of employee concerns about suspicious activities in Trump's accounts. (We know employees had concerns: nytimes.com/2019/05/19/bus…)
- Any evidence related to foreign entities backing DB's loans to Trump.
- DB's internal records of employee concerns about suspicious activities in Trump's accounts. (We know employees had concerns: nytimes.com/2019/05/19/bus…)
- Any evidence related to foreign entities backing DB's loans to Trump.
Who are these employees? I dont know, but I have some guesses:
- Rosemary Vrablic (Trump's personal banker)
- her old boss Tom Bowers
- Justin Kennedy (previously on the Trump account)
- Tammy McFadden (whistleblower who saw suspicious activity in Trump accounts)
- Rosemary Vrablic (Trump's personal banker)
- her old boss Tom Bowers
- Justin Kennedy (previously on the Trump account)
- Tammy McFadden (whistleblower who saw suspicious activity in Trump accounts)
And these redactions are even more mysterious. I don't know what they're referring to. Specific proposed or actual loans to Trump? Specific transactions that employees flagged? Deals related to the Kushners, who are also DB clients?
Maybe there will be clues on Tuesday.
Maybe there will be clues on Tuesday.
