The chatter about this post proves that people who object to the OPCW leaks do so not out of interest in truth or facts, but solely for narrative control. They present no facts or arguments, just shrieking about a celebrity highlighting factual documents.
twitter.com/search?q=-from…
twitter.com/search?q=-from…
"Journalist" and "war reporter" @janinedigi has deleted her tweet blatantly telling Sarandon to "Please stop" drawing attention to authentic documents exposing OPCW lies about its Douma investigation, citing only the fact that they "have friends in common". 
Narrative manager @im_PULSE is on there lamenting how he's explained to Sarandon why her "conspiracy theories" are wrong. In reality he's explained to her that Ian Henderson was not a part of the Douma FFM, the claim explicitly debunked in the article that Sarandon linked.
Hardcore narrative management.
Higgins is the only one to attempt to address the leaks, going with the somewhat unorthodox approach of telling people that they cannot see what is directly in front of their faces.
