It doesn’t clarify the confusion created by govt for Johnson to assert “entirely guided by the science”, without explaining why.
As for “common sense” as the arbiter of enforcement by the police, or employers, optimism isn’t a substitute for clarity and the shape of the law.
As for “common sense” as the arbiter of enforcement by the police, or employers, optimism isn’t a substitute for clarity and the shape of the law.
To give just one example of the debate raging all day, what is the science and/or common sense basis as to why people can socially distance 2m from hundreds of strangers in crowded parks, but not see both grand/parents at social distance either in a park or private garden?
Perhaps there is a very sound reason for this. If so, clarity and leadership requires the govt to spell it out to retain buy-in and trust from the public to keep going.
