THE defendant, indicted for a LIBEL on the President, applied to Court, to several members of congress (being in session) requesting their attendance as witnesses, on his behalf.
Motion was DENIED.
the right to present witnesses is not absolute;
a court may refuse to allow a defense witness to testify when the court finds that defendant’s counsel willfully FAILED to ID witness in pretrial discovery request.
There is a reason why Congress did not return to work this week [DC][non_COVID related].
Think [BOOM] drops this week and next [2019, 2020][+1].
[C]oats before [D]eclas [ongoing_now].
TERRORISM & THE CONVERGENCE OF
CRIMINAL & MILITARY DETENTION MODELS
2. Military detention & associational status,
SCOTUS on Hamdi: MIL detention until cessation of hostilities, w/o charge or trial = Okay!
procedural protections vs CIVIL detention.
"You'll be treated DIFFERENTLY."
Recall Graham v Kavanaugh in Senate, 2018:
since 9/11/ 2001.
Graham - Kavanaugh exchange reiterated this.
Latin term ex parte: court proceedings for the benefit of one party to a controversy, w/o the other being present,
Six of eight Nazi's were put to death by Electrocution in Washington, DC.
from Q2295 (initially Q2094)
YT deleted original.
Graham questioning then [listen carefully].
Military Law v. Criminal Law.
Think EO effective 1.1.19.
Think HRC panic.
Historically, note 1801 remark:
rhetoric of "treason" against political opponents diminished
US v. COOPER, 4 U.S. 341 (Apr 1800 SCOTUS case)
So those eventually charged will SCREAM
"political attack / motives" as usual??
Lend fuel for UCMJ?