My Authors
Read all threads
Thread: The Department of Health has refused to release copies of briefings and submissions for Minister Simon Harris relating to the spread of coronavirus. Some of these date back to January (including what I believe is the first one from Jan 21)
The Department has said the records are exempt under Section 29 and 30 of the FOI Act. The first is that they relate to a deliberative process (even ones from Jan???) and the second, well you can read for yourself - the most blurry and wide-ranging of all our many FOI exemptions:
The Department has said "the public interest would be best served by refusal of these records at this time". This is a mandatory public interest test that must take place for refusals using certain sections of the FOI Act.
Separately, the HSE is also refusing to release a copy of the "draft unsigned agreement" between themselves and the operators of private hospitals:
Access to that record has been refused under five different sections of the FOI Act: Section 29 on deliberations, Section 30 on functions and negotiations, Section 31, Section 35 on information obtained in confidence, and Section 36 on commercial sensitivity:
Section 29 has been invoked on the basis that the agreement is still under deliberation. Release of it could "impact negatively on the integrity" of that:
Section 30 has been invoked because the record is the subject of ongoing negotiations. Release of the record could be expected to disclose negotiating positions:
Section 35 and 36 have been invoked because the record contains "confidential information" and because they consider it to be commercially sensitive:
The HSE said that the public interest would not be served by release of the record. They said it would place them at a disadvantage in "its efforts to maximise its use of public funds and its capacity in response to the Covid-19 public health emergency"
For good measure, they also invoked Section 31 saying agreement was subject of confidential communications for the purposes of obtaining legal advice. They believe the record is "subject to legal professional privilege". No public interest test is required for this exemption:
In both of these @RightToKnowIE requests, we suggested that the Dept/HSE could simply publish these records to their websites and we would be happy to withdraw our requests. That hasn't happened and both will now go for internal review.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Ken Foxe

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!