@aluminumnatti @actual_chaos @themarketswork This is interesting. From Clapper's HPSCI testimony, we learn that on Dec 5, 2016 his National Intelligence Officer for Russia (Julia Gurganus) told HPSCI:
"In terms of favoring one candidate over another, you know, the evidence is a little bit unclear."
intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
"In terms of favoring one candidate over another, you know, the evidence is a little bit unclear."
intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
@aluminumnatti @actual_chaos @themarketswork The VERY NEXT DAY, Obama ordered the ICA on Russian intentions.
p38
republicans-intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
p38
republicans-intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
@aluminumnatti @actual_chaos @themarketswork We know what the ICA concluded. In contrast to Gurganus' statement that it wasn't clear whether Russia preferred one candidate over the other, the ICA made the bold statement that Russia preferred Trump.
@aluminumnatti @actual_chaos @themarketswork Guess who Clapper tasked to head the ICA? None other than Julia Gurganus! Can you believe it? Gurganus changed her tune in record time!
@aluminumnatti @actual_chaos @themarketswork How did Clapper explain this fundamental change? Well, just after the ICA was published on January 6, 2017, Clapper basically said on January 10, 2017 that his National Intelligence Officer for Russia was simply uniformed.
p17
intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
p17
intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…
@aluminumnatti @actual_chaos @themarketswork On May 9, 2017, Ms. Gurganus testified before SSCI. She told SSCI that coordination between the Russia government and Trump campaign "did not come up... We didn't have any evidence for that. There was not information that pointed us in that direction."
@aluminumnatti @actual_chaos @themarketswork Gurganus is on sabbatical from the US Government. Not fired, not resigned.
I bet @JuliaGurganus has an interesting story to tell.
I bet @JuliaGurganus has an interesting story to tell.
